Abstract:We ask whether firms behave differently depending on the political party in charge, above and beyond responding to any actual differences in policy. We use the pollution abatement behaviour of U.S. Steam Electric Power Plants under the Clean Water Act as our case study. Exploiting the variation provided by the outcome of tightly contested gubernatorial elections, we provide causal evidence that large firms respond to the political 'colour' of the governor in the state they operate, even when neither the stringency nor the enforcement of the rules depend on it. Within a theoretical model of the interaction between the regulator and the regulated firms, we show that multiple equilibria arise, and the outcomes of the election provide an effective coordination device. This unexpected behaviour has real-world consequences and leads to significant differences in pollution levels.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is: Will enterprises show different behaviors under the rule of different political parties, even when facing essentially the same regulatory framework? Specifically, the author studied the pollution abatement behaviors of steam power plants in the United States under the Clean Water Act and explored the influence of governors' political backgrounds (i.e., political "colors") on these enterprises' behaviors.
### Core Issues of the Paper
1. **The Relationship between Enterprise Behavior and Political Background**
- The author focuses on whether, under the same basic regulatory framework, enterprises' pollution abatement behaviors will vary depending on the political parties to which the governors of their states belong.
- The core issue of the research is to verify whether enterprises will respond to the "identity" of the ruling party, rather than just to the specific content or enforcement intensity of policies.
2. **Empirical Analysis**
- By taking advantage of the variability provided by the results of closely - contested gubernatorial elections, the author provides causal evidence indicating that there are significant differences in pollution abatement expenditures of large enterprises under Democratic and Republican governors.
- Although the emission standards at the federal level are consistent and there are no actual differences in the enforcement intensity among states, enterprises' behaviors are still influenced by the governors' political party backgrounds.
### Methodology
- **Regression Discontinuity Design (RDD)**
- The author uses regression discontinuity design to isolate the influence of governors' political party backgrounds on enterprise behaviors. This method is based on the randomness when the election results are close to a 50% voting rate, ensuring the validity of causal inferences.
- **Theoretical Model**
- A theoretical model is constructed to describe the interactive relationship between regulatory agencies and enterprises. Externalities among enterprises are introduced into the model, showing that when these externalities are considered, enterprises' abatement decisions become strategic complements, resulting in the existence of multiple equilibria.
### Practical Impacts
- **Environmental Consequences**
- The research finds that, although the policy itself does not change, a change in the governors' political party backgrounds can still lead to significant differences in pollution levels. This indicates that even non - policy - related political factors can have a substantial impact on enterprise behaviors and, in turn, on environmental quality.
### Conclusion
This paper reveals the unexpected influence of political backgrounds on enterprise behaviors, especially in the field of environmental policy. The research results not only provide a new perspective for understanding how enterprises respond to the political environment but also emphasize the important influence of political factors on actual economic and environmental outcomes.
### Formula Representation
The formulas involved in the discussion will be presented in Markdown format, for example:
- The key formula in regression discontinuity design:
\[
Y_i=\alpha + \beta D_i+ f(X_i)+\epsilon_i
\]
where \(Y_i\) is the explained variable (such as pollution abatement expenditure), \(D_i\) is the treatment state (such as the governor's political party background), \(X_i\) is a continuous variable (such as the voting share), \(f(X_i)\) is a smooth function, and \(\epsilon_i\) is an error term.
This format ensures the accuracy and readability of the formulas, making it easier for readers to understand.