Abstract:The technological, economic and administrative environment of the various infrastructure sectors is changing, making some of the characteristics of infrastructures as they were recognised in the 1970s outdated. At the brink of the year 2000, the public sector is giving away at least part of its role of planner and financier of transport and telecommunications facilities. A dominant centralist role has been replaced by a hybrid relation with private parties in which co-opetition (co-operation at the level of construction of physical infrastructures themselves and competition at the level of attached services where most added value is captured) seems to best describe how various players are kept together. Though evolution in the environment of national policy-models drives countries to converge in their outlook and regulation of infrastructure services, the paper presented here makes clear that national interpretations in Britain and the Netherlands become more similar and cope partly with the same issues, but still choose different models to regulate their market for transport and telecommunications. Despite national interpretation of international development and regulations, we can say that in sectors which are evolving from scratch in an anarchic way, national models cannot be recognised even though some differences remain. Technological turbulence has created such a situation in the telecom sector. In policy sectors where change is slower and national models are not replaced but modified within the historical path dependency, national styles remain more visible. International convergence is taking place to some extent in new regulatory regimes, but the results for various countries are not identical and the results sometimes seem rather more amorphous and incomprehensible in terms of national styles.

Regulation, innovation and market structure in International Telecommunications: The case of the 1956 TAT1 submarine cable

Transforming the Structure of Network Interconnection and Transport

Infrastructure Coopetition and the Creation of Value: an Anglo-Dutch Comparison of Regulatory Regimes for the Provision of Rail and Telephony Services

Repurposing Telecoms for Capital

Asymmetric Regulation on Steroids: U.S. Competition Policy and Fiber to the Home

Discursive profile of international telecommunication regulations as institutional dialogue: a sociosemiotic perspective

The Impact of Government Intervention in Technological Transitions: Evidence from Dutch History

Technology in Undersea Cable Systems: 50 Years of Progress

Universal service, specific services on generic networks, some logic begins to emerge in the policy area

Communications Infrastructure, Technological Solutionism and the International Legal Imagination

Open Access beyond cable: The case of Interactive TV

The Impact of Incentives in the Telecommunications Act of 1996 on Corporate Strategies

Exploring the Impact of Government Regulation on Technological Transitions; a Historical Perspective on Innovation in the Dutch Network-Based Industries

Incentive Regulation and Capital Structure in Digital Networks: Theory, Evidence and Implications

Regulating broadband wireless - Special issues on develping markets

Can Open Internet Access Be Imposed Upon European CATV Networks?

Broadband Network Evolution and Path Dependency

Telecommunications Law and Regulation an Introduction

Two national models of infrastructure co-opetition

Revenge of the Bell Heads: How the Net Heads Lost Control of the Internet

Networks of power. Analysing the evolution of the Danish internet infrastructure