Abstract:Rules are necessary to provide or shape the incentives of individuals and organizations. This is particularly true when free markets lead to undesirable outcomes. The Telecommunications Act of 1996 attempted to create incentives to foster competition. Ambiguity as well as the timing of the Act has led to delays in the clarification of rules and the rapid obsolescence of the document. The paper presents the strategies that common carriers adopted to try to tilt regulation in their favor, slow the entry of competitors, maintain their market leadership, and expand into other segments. Some of the strategies analyzed include lobbying efforts, court challenges, and lack of cooperation with new entrants.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problems that this paper attempts to solve are: the impact of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 on corporate strategic behavior, especially how the incentive mechanisms created by this act have influenced the behavior of telecommunications operators. Specifically, this paper explores the following issues:
1. **The impact of the act on market competition**: The Telecommunications Act of 1996 aimed to break the monopoly in the telecommunications industry by introducing competition. However, within five years after the implementation of the act, there were huge differences in the evaluation of the market competition situation. Some people thought that the competition was developing rapidly, while others thought that the industry was moving towards monopoly again. Therefore, this paper attempts to explain why such completely different views emerged.
2. **Corporate response strategies**: In order to maintain market leadership and slow down the entry of competitors, telecommunications operators have adopted a series of strategies. These strategies include lobbying the government, filing legal challenges, and not cooperating with new entrants. The paper analyzes the specific manifestations of these strategies and their underlying motives.
3. **The effectiveness of regulatory incentive mechanisms**: The paper discusses in detail how the incentive mechanisms in the Telecommunications Act of 1996 have influenced corporate behavior. For example, some provisions in the act grant the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and state - level regulatory agencies certain discretionary powers, which provide companies with the opportunity to influence rule - making through lobbying. In addition, the act lacks clear provisions in some aspects, resulting in companies facing different regulatory requirements in different states, thereby increasing operating costs.
4. **The difference between internal and external incentives**: By analyzing news events, the paper distinguishes between internal incentives (such as increasing market share and revenue) and external incentives (such as responding to regulatory requirements) for corporate decision - making. The study found that most corporate decisions are driven by internal factors, but regulation does have a significant impact on the activities of some companies.
5. **In - depth analysis of specific issues**: The paper pays special attention to two key issues - Interconnection and Universal Service. These two issues are crucial for promoting market competition, but they are not clearly defined in the act, so they have become the focus of disputes between companies and regulatory agencies.
In summary, the main purpose of this paper is to evaluate whether the incentive mechanisms created by the Telecommunications Act of 1996 have successfully promoted market competition by analyzing corporate behavior before and after the implementation of the act in 1996, and to reveal the strategic adjustments made by companies when facing new regulations.