Abstract:The DRM (Deese–Roediger–McDermott) paradigm produces robust false memories of non-presented critical words. After studying a thematic word list (e.g., bed, rest , and pillow ) participants falsely remember the critical item “sleep.” We report two false memory experiments. Study One introduces a novel use of the lexical decision task (LDT) to prime critical words. Participants see two letter-strings and make timed responses indicating whether they are both words. The word pairs Night-Bed and Dream-Thweeb both prime “sleep” but only one pair contains two words. Our primary purpose is to introduce this new methodology via two pilot experiments. The results, considered preliminary, are promising as they indicate that participants were as likely to recognize critical words (false memories) and presented words (true memories) just as when studying thematic lists. Study Two actually employs the standard DRM lists so that semantic priming is in play there as well. The second study, however, uses functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) to measure activity in the prefrontal cortex during a DRM task which includes a deception phase where participants intentionally lie about critical lures. False and true memories occurred at high levels and activated many of the same brain regions but, compared to true memories, cortical activity was higher for false memories and lies. Accuracy findings are accompanied by confidence and reaction time results. Both investigations suggest that it is difficult to distinguish accurate from inaccurate memories. We explain results in terms of activation-monitoring theory and Fuzzy Trace Theory. We provide real world implications and suggest extending the present research to varying age groups and special populations. A nagging question has not been satisfactorily answered: Could neural pathways exist that signal the presence of false memories and lies? Answering this question will require imaging experiments that focus on regions of distinction such as the anterior prefrontal cortex.

Dissociation and false memory: the moderating role of trauma and cognitive ability

An evaluation of nonclinical dissociation utilizing a virtual environment shows enhanced working memory and attention

Dissociation and other trauma symptomatology are linked to imbalance in the competing neurobehavioral decision systems

Comparison of semantic and phonological false memories in short- and long-term tests

Who is susceptible in three false memory tasks?

Semantic and episodic processes differently predict false memories in the DRM task

The Relationship Between DRM and Misinformation False Memories

Novel Approaches and Cognitive Neuroscience Perspectives on False Memory and Deception

False (or biased) memory: Emotion and working memory capacity effects in the DRM paradigm

Inter-identity amnesia in Dissociative Identity Disorder resolved: A Behavioural and Neurobiological study

Dissociative effects of phonological vs. semantic associates on recognition memory in the Deese/Roediger-McDermott paradigm.

Relation between Deese-Roediger-Mcdermott recall measures of false memory and the fading affect bias

A registered report testing the effect of sleep on Deese-Roediger-McDermott false memory: greater lure and veridical recall but fewer intrusions after sleep

Can Maltreated Children Inhibit True and False Memories for Emotional Information?

The impact of lying about a traumatic virtual reality experience on memory

Emotional false memories: the impact of response bias under speeded retrieval conditions

A self-reference false memory effect in the DRM paradigm: Evidence from Eastern and Western samples

A Study on the Factors Influencing False Memory

The differential illusion memory for high-associated abstract concepts (DIM-HA) effect

Reality monitoring and metacognitive judgments in a false-memory paradigm

A Study on the Modality Effect in True Memory and False Memory