Abstract:The DRM (Deese–Roediger–McDermott) paradigm produces robust false memories of non-presented critical words. After studying a thematic word list (e.g., bed, rest , and pillow ) participants falsely remember the critical item “sleep.” We report two false memory experiments. Study One introduces a novel use of the lexical decision task (LDT) to prime critical words. Participants see two letter-strings and make timed responses indicating whether they are both words. The word pairs Night-Bed and Dream-Thweeb both prime “sleep” but only one pair contains two words. Our primary purpose is to introduce this new methodology via two pilot experiments. The results, considered preliminary, are promising as they indicate that participants were as likely to recognize critical words (false memories) and presented words (true memories) just as when studying thematic lists. Study Two actually employs the standard DRM lists so that semantic priming is in play there as well. The second study, however, uses functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) to measure activity in the prefrontal cortex during a DRM task which includes a deception phase where participants intentionally lie about critical lures. False and true memories occurred at high levels and activated many of the same brain regions but, compared to true memories, cortical activity was higher for false memories and lies. Accuracy findings are accompanied by confidence and reaction time results. Both investigations suggest that it is difficult to distinguish accurate from inaccurate memories. We explain results in terms of activation-monitoring theory and Fuzzy Trace Theory. We provide real world implications and suggest extending the present research to varying age groups and special populations. A nagging question has not been satisfactorily answered: Could neural pathways exist that signal the presence of false memories and lies? Answering this question will require imaging experiments that focus on regions of distinction such as the anterior prefrontal cortex.

The impact of lying about a traumatic virtual reality experience on memory

Lying on misleading information: false confirmation leads to memory errors

Lie Construction Affects Information Storage Under High Memory Load Condition

Denials in informal co‐witness conversations do not affect memory for witnessed events

Distress reactions and susceptibility to misinformation for an analogue trauma event

Novel Approaches and Cognitive Neuroscience Perspectives on False Memory and Deception

Multisensory processing of emotional cues predicts intrusive memories after virtual reality trauma

Involvement Modulates the Effects of Deception on Memory in Daily Life

More Lies Lead to More Memory Impairments in Daily Life

An experimental examination of the effects of alcohol consumption and exposure to misleading postevent information on remembering a hypothetical rape scenario

Is the truth in the details? Extended narratives help distinguishing false "memories" from false "reports"

Fool me twice: how effective is debriefing in false memory studies?

Unringing the bell: Successful debriefing following a rich false memory study

Dissociation and false memory: the moderating role of trauma and cognitive ability

Tracking the Truth: The Effect of Face Familiarity on Eye Fixations during Deception

I lie because I am good at: psychopathic traits do not influence the effects of fabrication on memory

How do participants feel about the ethics of rich false memory studies?

Treat and Trick: A New Way to Increase False Memory

Emotion and false memory: How goal-irrelevance can be relevant for what people remember

Reality monitoring and metacognitive judgments in a false-memory paradigm

Selectively Interfering With Intrusive but Not Voluntary Memories of a Trauma Film: Accounting for the Role of Associative Memory