Abstract:The calorific value of any fuel is one of the crucial parameters to grade fuel's burning capability. The bomb calorimeter has historically been used to calculate coal's gross calorific value (GCV). However, for many years, engineers and scientists were trying to measure coal's GCV without a bomb calorimeter, using only laboratory-derived ultimate and/or proximate analyses to eliminate tedious and time-consuming laboratory analyses. In this study, Extra trees, Bagging, Decision tree, and Adaptive boosting are developed for the first time in coal's GCV modeling. In addition, the prediction and computational efficiency of previously applied decision tree-based algorithms, such as Random forest, Gradient boosting, and XGBoost are investigated. Well-established empirical models, namely Schuster, Mazumdar, Channiwala and Parikh, Parikh et al. and Central Fuel Research Institute of India are examined to compare their efficiency with newly developed algorithms. Proximate and ultimate analysis parameters are ranked based on their significance in GCV modeling. The studied models are tuned using an exhaustive grid search technique. Statistical indexes, such as explained variance (EV), mean absolute error (MAE), coefficient of determinant (R2), mean squared error (MSE), maximum error, minimum error, and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) are used to critique these models. To accomplish the goals, 7430 data points containing ten coal features, such as ash, moisture, fixed carbon, volatile matter, hydrogen, carbon, sulfur, nitrogen, oxygen, and GCV are selected from the U.S. Geological Survey Coal Quality (COALQUAL) database. It has been found that, due to simplicity and location-specific constraints, empirical models could not correlate proximate and/or ultimate analyses with GCV. Bagging and boosting techniques tested here performed well with the coefficient of determinant (R2) of over 0.97. The XGBoost model outperforms other tree-based algorithms with the most significant coefficient of determinant (R2 of 0.9974) and lowest error values (MSE of 14703.3, max_error of 1027.2, MAE of 89.2, MAPE of 0.009). The studied models' ranking (highest to lowest) based on their performance are XGBoost, Extra trees, Random forest, Bagging, Gradient boosting, Decision tree, and Adaptive boosting. The correlation heatmap and scatterplots used here clearly indicate that oxygen and carbon are the utmost significant, whereas volatile matter and sulfur are the least essential rank parameters for GCV modeling. The strategy suggested in this research can aid engineers/operators in obtaining a rapid and accurate determination of the GCV with a few coal features, thus lessening complicated, tedious, expensive, and time-consuming laboratory efforts.

SHAP-based interpretation of an XGBoost model in the prediction of grindability of coals and their blends

Analysis on Factors Influencing HGI and Crushing Behaviors of Blended Coals

Study on the Variation of Coal Properties for Different Coal Diameters and Its Effects on Combustion Characteristics

Experimental Investigation in the Grinding Behavior and the Comminuting Character of Coals of Different Rank

The model for calculating ultimate analysis of coal by its proximate analysis based on DE-SVM

Prediction of gross calorific value from coal analysis using decision tree-based bagging and boosting techniques

Prediction of Gray-King coke type from radical concentration and basic properties of coal blends

Effect of chemical, mineralogical, and petrographic properties on the grindability of a South African Highveld coal

Estimation of the coal higher heating value for energy systems relied on ultimate analysis with machine learning techniques

Application of Pyrolysis Gas Chromatography Technique to Evaluation of Coal-Generated Hydrocarbon

Machine learning - based shale wettability prediction: Implications for H2, CH4 and CO2 geo-storage

Prediction of HGI of South African coalfields: a comparative application of ANN, SVR and LSTM models

Non-linear Relationship Between Combustion Kinetic Parameters and Coal Quality

Granularity Collocation of Single Coal on Comprehensive Combustion of Blends

Non-isothermal Thermogravimetric Investigation on Mutual Effect Between Bituminite and Anthracite in Blends for Blast Furnace Injection

Machine learning prediction of higher heating value of biochar based on biomass characteristics and pyrolysis conditions

Machine learning-aided hydrothermal carbonization of biomass for coal-like hydrochar production: Parameters optimization and experimental verification

Prediction of higher heating value of coal based on gradient boosting regression tree model

Pore Characteristics and Slurryability of Coal Blends

Biomass Energy Transformation: Harnessing the Power of Explainable AI to Unlock the Potential of Ultimate Analysis Data

Interpretable XGBoost–SHAP machine learning technique to predict the compressive strength of environment-friendly rice husk ash concrete