Microgravity flow boiling experiments with liquid-vapor mixture inlet onboard the International Space Station
Issam Mudawar,V.S. Devahdhanush,Steven J. Darges,Mohammad M. Hasan,Henry K. Nahra,R. Balasubramaniam,Jeffrey R. Mackey
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2024.125299
IF: 5.2
2024-02-24
International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer
Abstract:This article is part of a series of studies culminating from the multi-objective Flow Boiling and Condensation Experiment (FBCE) onboard the International Space Station, which utilized the Flow Boiling Module (FBM) for experiments between February and July 2022. This study investigates microgravity flow boiling of n-Perfluorohexane with liquid-vapor mixture (two-phase) inlet conditions to the FBM with either one or two opposite walls heated. The FBM's channel has a rectangular cross-sectional area of 5.0 × 2.5 mm 2 and a heated length of 114.6 mm. Key parameters of interest include mass velocity (180 – 2400 kg/m 2 s), inlet quality (-0.01 – 0.87), inlet pressure (120 – 200 kPa), and heat flux (1.8 W/cm 2 to critical heat flux), and a large database is amassed. The flow is visualized via a high-speed video camera and photographs are recorded at each heating increment to assess the periodic flow patterns within the channel and the near-wall interfacial behavior. Flow patterns are complex and mainly characterized by high- and low-density fronts alternately traversing the channel to yield high- and low-density-dominant periods of boiling. At all operating conditions, high-density fronts are faster during high-density-dominant periods. At low inlet qualities, the flow is annular near the channel inlet with a central vapor core surrounded by an annular liquid layer. Each high-density front having a high liquid fraction leaves a thin liquid layer sheared onto the heated walls. Boiling occurs within the liquid layer and a vapor layer is formed next to the heated wall. Inlet quality and mass velocity most dictate the overall flow patterns followed by heating configuration, and to a much lesser extent, heat flux and inlet pressure. Heat transfer characteristics are assessed via averaged boiling curves, streamwise profiles of wall temperature and heat transfer coefficient, and parametric curves of local and averaged heat transfer coefficients. Inlet pressure has an insignificant effect on heat transfer. At similar operating conditions, both the heating configurations yield similar trends and values of heat transfer coefficient and critical heat flux (CHF, slightly higher for single-sided) even though double-sided heating adds twice the heat to the fluid and doubly raises local quality. The heat fluxes required for both onset of nucleate boiling degradation and CHF are larger at high mass velocities and low inlet qualities. For a fixed inlet quality, high mass velocities yield higher average heat transfer coefficients at both lower and higher heat fluxes, while the nucleate boiling regime at intermediate heat fluxes is unaffected. For a fixed mass velocity, higher inlet qualities yield higher and lower average heat transfer coefficients at lower and higher heat fluxes, respectively.
engineering, mechanical,thermodynamics,mechanics