Abstract:This study optimizes multidimensional variables in extrusion printing. The bio‐ink development process accelerates material and process selection, enhances molding resolution, and reduces costs related to scaffold manufacturing. The research focuses on the mechanical properties and tissue printing after cell addition, demonstrating improved fidelity and stability in printed nose tissue. These findings validate the feasibility and potential of the process in tissue engineering. Extrusion‐based 3D printing technology is currently demonstrating considerable potential in the field of tissue engineering scaffolds, enabling the construction of in vitro models with complex structures and functions using a wide range of biomaterials and cells at a low cost. In recent years, researchers have spent considerable effort developing novel bio‐inks and employing a greater variety of cell sources to enhance biological compatibility and functionality. However, the majority of current bio‐ink materials are unprintable due to their low viscosity and long curing time, as well as insufficient shape fidelity before the secondary cross‐linking process. The study aims to bridge this gap by optimizing the material ratios and predicting the printing process before work. This article presents new strategies for the design, fabrication, and analysis of a new composite bio‐ink material. The optimal ink ratios are verified by a design of experiments (DOE) experimental design and evaluation metrics for printing printability (Pr) values. A machine learning model is used to predict the ink printing area and determine the printing process parameters. The influence mechanism of ink materials with different concentrations of poly (ethylene glycol) diacrylate (PEGDA) ratios on printed fibers is investigated. Finally, the optimal results are used as an example to demonstrate the printability of multilayer stents. Thus, the design approach allows for the rapid and cost‐effective exploration of novel ink ratios, while also providing higher fidelity and more accurate process metrics for the fabrication of tissue structures with multidimensional variables.

Laser Lithography for Bioprinting: From 3D Scaffolds to Plant Based Resins

High-resolution Projection-Based 3D Bioprinting

Freeform laser and inkjet printing of biological constructs

Modeling the Printability of Photocuring and Strength Adjustable Hydrogel Bioink During Projection-Based 3D Bioprinting.

3D Bioprinting: A Novel Avenue for Manufacturing Tissues and Organs

Stereolithography apparatus and digital light processing-based 3D bioprinting for tissue fabrication

Inkjet 3D Bioprinting for Tissue Engineering and Pharmaceutics

Minimal-invasive 3D laser printing of microimplants

3D Bioprinting: from Benches to Translational Applications.

Advances in Photocrosslinkable Materials for 3D Bioprinting

Laser-based bioprinting for multilayer cell patterning in tissue engineering and cancer research

New Strategies for High Efficiency and Precision Bioprinting by DOE Technology and Machine Learning

3D bioprinting for biomedical devices and tissue engineering: A review of recent trends and advances

Bioprinting: 3D Bioprinting: from Benches to Translational Applications (Small 23/2019)

3D printing of functional biomaterials for tissue engineering

Bio-resin for high resolution lithography-based biofabrication of complex cell-laden constructs

Light Sheet-Based Laser Patterning Bioprinting Produces Long-Term Viable Full-Thickness Skin Constructs

From 3D printing to 3D bioprinting: the material properties of polymeric material and its derived bioink for achieving tissue specific architectures

Recent Developments in 3D Bio-Printing and Its Biomedical Applications

Inkjet printing biomaterials for tissue engineering: bioprinting

3D digital light process bioprinting: Cutting-edge platforms for resolution of organ fabrication