Abstract:Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting, as a freeform biomedical manufacturing approach, has been increasingly adopted for the fabrication of constructs analogous to living tissues. Generally, materials printed during 3D bioprinting are referred as bioinks, which may include living cells, extracellular matrix materials, cell media, and/or other additives. For 3D bioprinting to be an enabling tissue engineering approach, the bioink printability is a critical requirement as tissue constructs must be able to be printed and reproduce the complex micro-architecture of native tissues in vitro in sufficient resolution. The bioink printability is generally characterized in terms of the controllable formation of well-defined droplets/jets/filaments and/or the morphology and shape fidelity of deposited building blocks. This review presents a comprehensive overview of the studies of bioink printability during representative 3D bioprinting processes, including inkjet printing, laser printing, and micro-extrusion, with a focus on the understanding of the underlying physics during the formation of bioink-based features. A detailed discussion is conducted based on the typical time scales and dimensionless quantities for printability evaluation during bioprinting. For inkjet printing, the Z (the inverse of the Ohnesorge number), Weber, and capillary numbers have been employed for the construction of phase diagrams during the printing of Newtonian fluids, while the Weissenberg and Deborah numbers have been utilized during the printing of non-Newtonian bioinks. During laser printing of Newtonian solutions, the jettability can be characterized using the inverse of the Ohnesorge number, while Ohnesorge, elasto-capillary, and Weber numbers have been utilized to construct phase diagrams for typical non-Newtonian bioinks. For micro-extrusion, seven filament types have been identified including three types of well-defined filaments and four types of irregular filaments. During micro-extrusion, the Oldroyd number has been used to characterize the dimensions of the yielded areas of Herschel-Bulkley fluids. Non-ideal jetting behaviors are common during the droplet-based inkjet and laser printing processes due to the local nonuniformity and nonhomogeneity of cell-laden bioinks.

Bioprinting: 3D Bioprinting: from Benches to Translational Applications (Small 23/2019)

3D Bioprinting: from Benches to Translational Applications.

3D Bioprinting: A Novel Avenue for Manufacturing Tissues and Organs

3D Bioprinting: an Emerging Technology Full of Opportunities and Challenges

3D Bioprinting: from Structure to Function

Inkjet 3D Bioprinting for Tissue Engineering and Pharmaceutics

Recent developments and challenges of 3D bioprinting technologies

3D bioprinting for biomedical devices and tissue engineering: A review of recent trends and advances

Trends on Physical Understanding of Bioink Printability

Evaluation of Bioink Printability for Bioprinting Applications

Bioprintability: Physiomechanical and Biological Requirements of Materials for 3D Bioprinting Processes

3D Bioprinting for Tissue and Organ Fabrication

Techniques and applications of 3D bioprinting

Organ Bioprinting: Are We There Yet?

Global hotspots and emerging trends in 3D bioprinting research

3D Bioprinting and the Current Applications in Tissue Engineering

3D Bioprinting of Human Tissues: Biofabrication, Bioinks, and Bioreactors

Development of 3D bioprinting: From printing methods to biomedical applications

Inkjet Bioprinting of Biomaterials

Prospect and retrospect of 3D bio-printing

Retrospective: Advances and Opportunities of 3D Bioprinting in China over Three Decades