Abstract:Background: Opinion leadership, educational outreach visiting, and innovation championing are commonly used strategies to address barriers to implementing innovations and evidence-based practices in healthcare settings. Despite voluminous research, ambiguities persist in how these strategies work and under what conditions they work well, work poorly, or work at all. The current paper develops middle-range theories to address this gap. Methods: Conceptual articles, systematic reviews, and empirical studies informed the development of causal pathway diagrams (CPDs). CPDs are visualization tools for depicting and theorizing about the causal process through which strategies operate, including the mechanisms they activate, the barriers they address, and the proximal and distal outcomes they produce. CPDs also clarify the contextual conditions (i.e., preconditions and moderators) that influence whether, and to what extent, the strategy's causal process unfolds successfully. Expert panels of implementation scientists and health professionals rated the plausibility of these preliminary CPDs and offered comments and suggestions on them. Findings: Theoretically, opinion leadership addresses potential adopters' uncertainty about likely consequences of innovation use (determinant) by promoting positive attitude formation about the innovation (mechanism), which results in an adoption decision (proximal outcome), which leads to innovation use (intermediate outcome). As this causal process repeats, penetration, or spread of innovation use, occurs (distal outcome). Educational outreach visiting addresses knowledge barriers, attitudinal barriers, and behavioral barriers (determinants) by promoting critical thinking and reflection about evidence and practice (mechanism), which results in behavioral intention (proximal outcome), behavior change (intermediate outcome), and fidelity, or guideline adherence (distal outcome). Innovation championing addresses organizational inertia, indifference, and resistance (determinants) by promoting buy-in to the vision, fostering a positive implementation climate, and increasing collective efficacy (mechanisms), which leads to participation in implementation activities (proximal outcome), initial use of the innovation with increasing skill (intermediate outcome) and, ultimately, greater penetration and fidelity (distal outcomes). Experts found the preliminary CPDs plausible or highly plausible and suggested additional mechanisms, moderators, and preconditions, which were used to amend the initial CPD. Discussion: The middle-range theories depicted in the CPDs furnish testable propositions for implementation research and offer guidance for selecting, designing, and evaluating these social influence implementation strategies in both research studies and practice settings.

Explaining what works: using causal chain analysis in systematic reviewsExplaining what works: using causal chain analysis in systematic reviews

Conceptualising causal pathways in systematic reviews of international development interventions through adopting a causal chain analysis approach

Applying Bradford Hill to assessing causality in systematic reviews: A transparent approach using process tracing

Changing hearts and minds: theorizing how, when, and under what conditions three social influence implementation strategies work

The Use of Contribution Analysis in Evaluating Health Interventions: A Scoping Review

Current trends in the application of causal inference methods to pooled longitudinal non-randomised data: a protocol for a methodological systematic review

Formulating causal questions and principled statistical answers

A biologist's guide to model selection and causal inference

An Application of the Causal Roadmap in Two Safety Monitoring Case Studies: Covariate-Adjustment and Outcome Prediction using Electronic Health Record Data

Counterfactual reasoning using causal Bayesian networks as a healthcare governance tool

Unpacking the design, implementation and uptake of community-integrated health care services: a critical realist synthesis

An AI assistant to help review and improve causal reasoning in epidemiological documents

Causal analyses in longitudinal observational studies in oral health: A scoping review

Causal inference in ethnographic research: Refining explanations with abductive logic, strength of evidence assessments, and graphical models

Bayesian Network Models of Causal Interventions in Healthcare Decision Making: Literature Review and Software Evaluation

Visual analysis in single case experimental design studies: Brief review and guidelines

A Review and Synthesis of Multi-level Models for Causal Inference with Individual Level Exposures

Causally-interpretable meta-analysis: clearly-defined causal effects and two case studies

Discovering Internal Validity Threats and Operational Concerns in Single-Case Experimental Designs Through Directed Acyclic Graphs

Using qualitative comparative analysis as a mixed methods synthesis in systematic mixed studies reviews: Guidance and a worked example

A scoping review of causal methods enabling predictions under hypothetical interventions