Abstract:After many years of research across disciplines, it remains unclear whether people are more motivated to seek appraisals that accurately match self-views (self-verification) or are as favorable as possible (self-enhancement). Within sociology, mixed findings in identity theory have fueled the debate. A problem here is that a commonly employed statistical approach does not take into account the direction of a discrepancy between how we see ourselves and how we think others see us in terms of a given identity, yet doing so is critical for determining which self-motive is at play. We offer a test of three competing models of identity processes, including a new "mixed motivations" model where self-verification and self-enhancement operate simultaneously. We compare the models using the conventional statistical approach versus response surface analysis. The latter method allows us to determine whether identity discrepancies involving over-evaluation are as distressing as those involving under-evaluation. We use nationally representative data and compare results across four different identities and multiple outcomes. The two statistical approaches lead to the same conclusions more often than not and mostly support identity theory and its assumption that people seek self-verification. However, response surface tests reveal patterns that are mistaken as evidence of self-verification by conventional procedures, especially for the spouse identity. We also find that identity discrepancies have different effects on distress and self-conscious emotions (guilt and shame). Our findings have implications not only for research on self and identity across disciplines, but also for many other areas of research that incorporate these concepts and/or use difference scores as explanatory variables.

A Diffuse-Avoidant Identity Processing Style: Strategic Avoidance or Self-Confusion?

Identity Processing Style and Depression: The Mediational Role of Experiential Avoidance and Self-Regulation

Toward a More Nuanced Perspective on Detachment: Differentiating Schizoid and Avoidant Personality Styles through Qualities of the Self-Representation

Social Media Social Comparison of Ability (but not Opinion) Predicts Lower Identity Clarity: Identity Processing Style as a Mediator

Situational formality, personality, and avoidance‐avoidance conflict as causes of interpersonal equivocation

Avoidant Attachment and the Processing of Emotion Information: Selective Attention or Cognitive Avoidance?

The inauthentic other: Social comparison theory and brand avoidance within consumer sub-cultures

Identity Theft: Social Withdrawal as a Risk Factor in Identity Development

You Can’t See the Real Me: Attachment Avoidance, Self-Verification, and Self-Concept Clarity

To thine own self be true? Clarifying the effects of identity discrepancies on psychological distress and emotions

The Structure of Experiential Avoidance and External Validity: An Investigation of the Multidimensional Experiential Avoidance Questionnaire

The Importance of Identity Style for the Level of Religiosity in Different Developmental Periods

Making Sense of 'Us': Mechanisms Linking Attachment Avoidance and Couple Identity Clarity

Disinhibition of negative true self for identity reconstructions in cyberspace: Advancing self-discrepancy theory for virtual setting

The effect of approach and avoidance motivation on self-perception

The motivation to integrate and perceived discrimination as antecedents of cultural identity styles.

Blending in at the Cost of Losing Oneself: Dishonest Self-Disclosure Erodes Self-Concept Clarity in Social Anxiety

Coping self-efficacy influences health information avoidance

Social threat avoidance depends on action-outcome predictability

Depersonalization Disorder: Directed Forgetting as a function of Emotionality

Identity Shift Effects of Self-Presentation and Confirmatory and Disconfirmatory Feedback on Self-Perceptions of Brand Identification