Social Media Social Comparison of Ability (but not Opinion) Predicts Lower Identity Clarity: Identity Processing Style as a Mediator

Chia-chen Yang,Sean M. Holden,Mollie D. K. Carter

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-017-0801-6

2018-01-11

Journal of Youth and Adolescence

Abstract:Social comparison on social media has received increasing attention, but most research has focused on one type of social comparison and its psycho-emotional implications. Little is known about how different types of social comparison influence youth’s identity development. Drawing on the theories of identity processing styles and social comparison, we examined how two different forms of social comparison on social media related to three identity processing styles, which in turn predicted youth’s global self-esteem and identity clarity. We surveyed 219 college freshmen (Mage = 18.29; 74% female) once in the Fall and once in the Spring. Social comparison of ability on social media was related to concurrent diffuse-avoidant identity processing style, which predicted lower identity clarity months later. In contrast, social comparison of opinion on social media did not influence college freshmen’s global self-esteem and identity clarity through identity processing styles. The findings clarified the implications of online social comparison for youth’s identity development.

psychology, developmental

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

This paper attempts to explore how two different forms of social comparison on social media (ability social comparison and opinion social comparison) are related to three identity - processing styles (information - processing style, normative - processing style, and diffusion - avoidance - processing style), and further examines how these identity - processing styles predict college students' overall self - esteem and identity clarity. Specifically, the research aims to address this issue through the following aspects:

1. **Relationship between types of social comparison and identity - processing styles**:
- Explore how ability social comparison on social media (Research Question 1a) and opinion social comparison on social media (Research Question 1b) are related to the three identity - processing styles respectively.

2. **Relationship between identity - processing styles and identity outcomes**:
- Hypothesize that the information - processing style is related to higher overall self - esteem and identity clarity (Hypothesis 2a).
- Hypothesize that the diffusion - avoidance - processing style is related to lower overall self - esteem and identity clarity (Hypothesis 2b).
- For the normative - processing style, due to inconsistent empirical evidence, the researchers pose a research question: How is the normative - processing style related to overall self - esteem and identity clarity (Research Question 2)?

3. **Path analysis**:
- To test the directionality of the above relationships and control the identity - outcome variables at time 1, the researchers construct a path model, including four independent variables at time 1 (ability social comparison on social media, opinion social comparison on social media, overall self - esteem, identity clarity) and four outcome variables at time 2 (the same as above), as well as three identity - processing styles at time 1 as mediating variables.

Through these research questions and hypotheses, the paper attempts to fill the gaps in the existing literature, especially the lack of research on the impact of opinion social comparison on social media on the identity development of adolescents. In addition, the study also explores how different types of social media social comparison indirectly affect college students' overall self - esteem and identity clarity through different identity - processing styles.