Comparison between the Extraperitoneal Route with the Transperitoneal Route for the Permanent Colostomy: A Meta-Analysis with Rcts and Systematic Review

Jinlong Luo,Dujanand Singh,Faqiang Zhang,Xinting Yang,Xiaoying Zha,Huaiwu Jiang,Lie Yang,Hua Yang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-850414/v1

2021-09-03

Abstract:Abstract Aim To assess the efficacy of extraperitoneal colostomy(EPC) in the prevention of stoma-related complications. Background Transperitoneal colostomy (TPC) is still a widely used surgical approach. However, TPC has been reported with highly incidence of stoma-related complications, like parastomal hernia, stomal retraction, stomal prolapse.The purpose of EPC is to prevent these complications. But it is still lack of evidence-based basis. Material and methods MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, MOOSE, Pubmed, Google Scholar, Baidu Scholar, and the Cochrane Library were searched to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis with RCTs. Revman 5.4 was performed in the meta-analysis. Results A total of 5 RCTs were eligible in this study. Compared with TPC, EPC group had lower incidence in Parastomal Hernia (RR, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.04–0.52, P=0.003, I 2 =0%), Stomal Prolapse (RR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.08–0.95, P=0.04, I 2 =0%) and a higher rate of defaecation Sensation (RR, 3.51; 95% CI, 2.47–5.0, P<0.00001, I 2 =37%). No statistical difference was observed in Stoma Retraction, Colostomy Construction Time, Stoma Ischemia, and Necrosis. Conclusion An extraperitoneal colostomy is associated with a lower rate of postoperative complication compared to transperitoneal colostomy. Randomized controlled trial meta-analysis showed better results in permanent colostomy after abdominoperineal resection.