Abstract:Objective: To investigate the influence of conventional preoperative intestinal preparation and unplanned preparation on the visual field of pelvic organ prolapse repair surgery. Methods: The patients who underwent transvaginal pelvic organ prolapse repair surgery in Peking University People's Hospital from September 2017 to July 2018 were selected as the research objects except those who had undergone colorectal surgery and chronic constipation. The surgery doctor was blinded by intestinal preparation. There was no intestinal preparation in non intestinal preparation group and polyethylene glycol was taken orally in intestinal preparation group. The main outcome measures were the effect of intestinal contents on the surgical field, the presence of fecal leakage, and the nature and volume of fecal leakage. The standard of fecal contamination was: mild, less than 15 ml, moderate, 15-30 ml, and severe, >30 ml. Secondary indicators were patient satisfaction and symptoms of routine bowel preparation. Results: A total of 120 patients (60 cases of non intestinal preparation group, 60 cases of intestinal preparation group) were selected, including transvaginal hysterectomy, vaginal anterior or posterior colporrhaphy (some patients with anterior prolapse repair with mesh), sacrospinal ligament suspension, total colpectomy and colpocleisis, laparoscopic sacral colpopexy, anti-incontinence surgery. The median age of the patients in non intestinal preparation group was 62 years, and the median age of intestinal preparation group was 60 years. There were no significant differences in median age, anesthesia, operation method, blood loss, operation time and perioperative infection between the two groups (all P>0.05). Fecal contamination occurred in 10% (6/60) of the patients without intestinal preparation and 32% (19/60) of the patients with intestinal preparation (P=0.042). Comparing the two groups, 10% (6/60) of the patients with intestinal preparation had moderate and severe contamination, and the patients without intestinal preparation was only 2% (1/60), there was significant difference (P=0.017). In intestinal preparation group, nausea (8%, 5/60), vomiting (5%, 3/60), abdominal distension (22%, 13/60), fatigue (5%, 3/60) and palpitation (2%, 1/60) were higher than those in non intestinal preparation group. Conclusions: Intestinal preparation with oral laxatives before pelvic organ prolapse repair surgery is not beneficial to the cleaning of the surgical field and increases the discomfort of intestinal preparation. It is safe and feasible for most patients with pelvic organ prolapse to perform pelvic organ prolapse repair surgery without intestinal preparation.

Comparative Evaluation of Enema Alone and in Combination with Oral Polyethylene Glycol for Bowel Preparation Before Transvaginal Pelvic Floor Reconstruction in Elderly Patients: a Retrospective Cohort Study

Effectiveness of Mechanical Bowel Preparation Before Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Gynecologic Surgery: a Randomized, Single-Blind, Controlled Trial

Comparison of Two Litre Polyethylene Glycol Plus Bisacodyl Versus Four Litre Polyethylene Glycol As Preparation for Colonoscopy in Colon Disease: a Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis

[A Randomized Single Blind Comparison of Conventional Bowel Preparation and Unplanned Preoperative Preparation for Pelvic Organ Prolapse].

Polyethylene glycol combined with lactulose has better efficacy than polyethylene glycol alone in bowel preparation before colonoscopy: A meta-analysis

Application of the combination of peptisorb and polyethylene glycol electrolyte powder in interstines preparation before operation

Randomized clinical trial of a split-dose bowel preparation with 2L polyethylene glycol plus castor oil versus 1L polyethylene glycol plus castor oil and ascorbic acid before colonoscopy

Effect of Bowel Preparation Before Vaginal Surgery on Perioperative Outcomes in Patients with Pelvic Floor Disorders

Bowel Preparation Efficacy and Discomfort of 2 L Polyethylene Glycol Combined with Linaclotide Versus 3 L Polyethylene Glycol: a Noninferiority, Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial

Comparison of oral sodium phosphate tablets and polyethylene glycol lavage solution for colonoscopy preparation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

Lubiprostone plus polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage solution (PEG-ELS) versus PEG-ELS for bowel preparation in chronic constipation: a randomized controlled trial

The Advantage of Polyethylene Glycol Electrolyte Solution Combined with Lactulose in Patients with Long Interval Preparation-to-colonoscopy.

Low-Volume Polyethylene Glycol Improved Patient Attendance in Bowel Preparation Before Colonoscopy: A Meta-Analysis with Trial Sequential Analysis

A Randomized Trial of Split Dose 3 L Polyethylene Glycol Lavage Solution, 2 L Polyethylene Glycol Lavage Combined With Castor Oil, and 1 L of Polyethylene Glycol Lavage Solution Combined With Castor Oil and Ascorbic Acid for Preparation for Colonoscopy

Split‐dose 4‐L Polyethylene Glycol Regimen for Patients with Previous Colorectal Surgery in Bowel Preparation Before Colonoscopy: A Randomized, Controlled, Single‐blind Study

Observation of the application effect of low-volume polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage solution (PEG-ELS) combined with ascorbic acid tablets in bowel preparation for colonoscopy in hospitalized patients

Patient-directed vs. fixed-volume PEG for colonoscopy preparation: a randomized controlled trial

Same-Day Single Dose of 2 Liter Polyethylene Glycol is Not Inferior to The Standard Bowel Preparation Regimen in Low-Risk Patients: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.

Efficacy of Polyethylene Glycol Electrolyte Powder Combined with Linaclotide for Colon Cleansing in Patients with Chronic Constipation undergoing colonoscopy: a Multi-centre, single-blinded, Randomized-Controlled Trial.

Comparison of the extraperitoneal and transperitoneal routes for permanent colostomy: a meta-analysis with RCTs and systematic review

Sodium phosphate versus polyethylene glycol for colonoscopy bowel preparation: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials