Abstract:Objective:To compare the efficacy of oral sulfate solution (OSS) and polyethylene glycol (PEG) electrolyte powder for colonoscopy bowel preparation.Methods:A total of 283 randomized patients from 9 centers in China taking OSS ( n=143) or PEG ( n=140) using two-day split bowel preparation regimen received colonoscopy and assessment. The primary index was the bowel preparation success rate [global Boston bowel preparation scale (BBPS)≥ 6 by independent assessment center]. Secondary indices included BBPS global and segmental scores, investigator satisfaction (5-point Likert scale) with the quality of bowel preparation, patient satisfaction assessed by questionnaires, and patient tolerance assessed by Sharma scale. Compliance and safety were compared between the two groups. Results:The bowel preparation success rates were 100.0% for OSS and 99.3% for PEG [adjusted difference 0.7% (95% CI: -5.3% - 6.7%), P<0.001 for non-inferiority]. The BBPS global score in OSS group was significantly higher than that in PEG group (8.1 VS 7.7, P<0.001). The segment BBPS scores were also higher in OSS group than those in PEG group for all 3 segments (right colon: 2.4 VS 2.3, P=0.002; transverse colon: 2.8 VS 2.7, P=0.018; left colon: 2.8 VS 2.7, P=0.007). Investigator Likert score in the OSS group was significantly higher than that in the PEG group (2.6 VS 2.3, P<0.001). There was no significant difference in compliance between OSS and PEG, except for the second dose (90.9% VS 82.6%, P=0.039). There was no significant difference in patient satisfaction, Sharma score or proportion of patients with tolerance-related symptoms between the two groups. Safety was comparable between the two groups, and all adverse events were mild to moderate. Conclusion:OSS has comparable efficacy with PEG, with higher BBPS scores in all segments, better investigator satisfaction, better compliance in split dose, and comparable patient tolerance and safety.

Sediment Temperature and Redox Potential As Confound Factors Controlling CO2 Flux Between Sediment and the Atmosphere in an Intertidal Zone

Oral sulfate solution versus polyethylene glycol for colonoscopy bowel preparation: a randomized controlled study in phase Ⅲ

Efficacy of Polyethylene Glycol Electrolyte Powder Combined with Linaclotide for Colon Cleansing in Patients with Chronic Constipation undergoing colonoscopy: a Multi-centre, single-blinded, Randomized-Controlled Trial.

Interaction between platinum complexes and a methionine motif found in copper transport proteins.

Comparison of Two Litre Polyethylene Glycol Plus Bisacodyl Versus Four Litre Polyethylene Glycol As Preparation for Colonoscopy in Colon Disease: a Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis

Baby dies after long wait in casualty

Extraordinary refractive-index increase in lithium niobate caused by low-dose ion implantation.

Efficacy and Safety of Lubiprostone for the Treatment of Functional Constipation in Chinese Adult Patients: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double‐blind, Placebo‐controlled Trial

Developing a program to monitor patient satisfaction and outcome in the ambulatory surgery setting.

S2149 Assessment of Lubiprostone as an Adjunct Therapy for Bowel Preparation in Colonoscopy: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Application of linaclotide in bowel preparation for colonoscopy in patients with constipation: A prospective randomized controlled study

A Randomized Trial of Split Dose 3 L Polyethylene Glycol Lavage Solution, 2 L Polyethylene Glycol Lavage Combined With Castor Oil, and 1 L of Polyethylene Glycol Lavage Solution Combined With Castor Oil and Ascorbic Acid for Preparation for Colonoscopy

Impact of preprocedure simethicone on adenoma detection rate during colonoscopy: a multicenter, endoscopist-blinded randomized controlled trial.

Efficacy of Linaclotide in Combination with Polyethylene Glycol for Bowel Preparation in Chinese Patients Undergoing Colonoscopy Polypectomy: Protocol for a Randomised Controlled Trial.

Polyethylene Glycol Plus Linaclotide is an Effective Bowel Preparation Regimen for Patients with Bristol Stool Scale 1-2: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Efficacy and tolerability of 1 L polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid with senna versus 2 L polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid for colonoscopic bowel preparation: Prospective, randomized, investigator-blinded trial

Bowel preparation with linaclotide and 1 L polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid prior to colonoscopy in chronic constipated patients

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of an oral sulfate solution and 3-liter polyethylene glycol on bowel preparation before colonoscopy: a phase III multicenter randomized controlled trial

Differences in the inhibitory effect of Cd2+, Mn2+ and Al3+ on the uptake of dopamine by synaptosomes from forebrain and from striatum of the rat.

Lactulose Vs Polyethylene Glycol for Bowel Preparation: A Single-Center, Prospective, Randomized Controlled Study Based on BMI.

Efficacy and Acceptability of 1 Liter of Polyethylene Glycol with Ascorbic Acid vs. 2 Liters of Polyethylene Glycol Plus Mosapride and Sennoside for Colonoscopy Preparation