Abstract:Objective Treatment of neonates with anorectal malformations (ARMs) can be challenging due to variability in anatomic definitions, multiple approaches to surgical management, and heterogeneity of reported outcomes. The purpose of this systematic review is to summarize existing evidence, identify treatment controversies, and provide guidelines for perioperative care. Methods The American Pediatric Surgical Association Outcomes and Evidence Based Practice Committee (OEBP) drafted five consensus-based questions regarding management of children with ARMs. These questions were related to categorization of ARMs and optimal methods and timing of surgical management. A comprehensive search strategy was performed, and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were used to perform the systematic review to attempt to answer five questions related to surgical care of ARM. Results A total of 10,843 publications were reviewed, of which 90 were included in final recommendations, and some publications addressed more than one question (question: 1 n= 6, 2 n= 63, n=15, 4 n= 44). Studies contained largely heterogenous groups of ARMs, making direct comparison for each subtype challenging and therefore, no specific recommendation for optimal surgical approach based on outcomes can be made. Both loop and divided colostomy may be acceptable methods of fecal diversion for patients with a diagnosis of anorectal malformation, however, loop colostomies have higher rates of prolapse in the literature reviewed. In terms of timing of repair, there did not appear to be significant differences in outcomes between early and late repair groups. Clear and uniform definitions are needed in order to ensure similar populations of patients are compared moving forward. Recommendations are provided based primarily on A-D levels of evidence. Conclusions Evidence-based best practices for ARMs are lacking for many aspects of care. Multi-institutional registries have made progress to address some of these gaps. Further prospective and comparative studies are needed to improve care and provide consensus guidelines for this complex patient population. Level of Evidence 3

Comparing Loop and Divided Colostomy for Anorectal Malformation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Classic divided sigmoidostomy vs loop sigmoidostomy in anorectal malformations: time for change?

Postoperative complications of umbilical loop colostomy for anorectal malformations in neonates compared with the conventional abdominal stoma: a non-randomized study

Total abdominal colectomy versus diverting loop ileostomy with colonic lavage for fulminant clostridium difficile colitis: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes

Meta-analysis: loop ileostomy versus colostomy to prevent complications of anterior resection for rectal cancer

Clinical application of middle descending colon-double lumen ostomy with distal stoma narrowing in the treatment of anorectal malformation

Complications of Preventive Loop Ileostomy Versus Colostomy: a Meta-Analysis, Trial Sequential Analysis, and Systematic Review

Short and Long-Term Outcomes of PSARP versus LAARP and Single versus Staged Repair for Infants with High-Type Anorectal Malformations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Classification and Surgical Management of Anorectal Malformations: A Systematic Review and Evidence-Based Guideline from the APSA Outcomes and Evidence-Based Practice Committee

Functional Outcome in Patients With Anorectal Malformation With Recto-prostatic or Recto-bulbar Urethral Fistula and Comparison Between Different Surgical Approaches: A Multi-center Study

Turnbull-Cutait pull-through coloanal anastomosis versus standard coloanal anastomosis plus diverting ileostomy for low anterior resection: a meta-analysis and systematic review

The Role of Laparoscopy in Anorectal Malformations

Stapled Anastomosis Versus Hand-Sewn Anastomosis With Mucosectomy for Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Postoperative Outcomes, Functional Outcomes, and Oncological Safety

When should we add a diverting loop ileostomy to laparoscopic ileocolic resection for primary Crohn's disease?

Protective loop ileostomy or colostomy? a risk evaluation of all common complications

Defunctioning Cannula Ileostomy after Lower Anterior Resection of Rectal Cancer

Temporary diverting loop ileostomy in Crohn's disease surgery; indications and outcome

Diverting ileostomy in low anterior resection: single center retrospective analysis

Comparing Outcomes Between Side‐to‐Side Anastomosis and Other Anastomotic Configurations after Intestinal Resection for Patients with Crohn’s Disease: A Meta‐Analysis

Prophylactic intra-abdominal drainage following colorectal anastomoses. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Comparison of high or modified low tie of the inferior mesenteric artery in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: A meta-analysis