Abstract:Summary Learning about cause and effect is arguably the main goal in applied econometrics. In practice, the validity of these causal inferences is contingent on a number of critical assumptions regarding the type of data that has been collected, and the substantive knowledge that is available about the phenomenon under investigation. For instance, unobserved confounding factors threaten the internal validity of estimates; data availability is often limited to nonrandom, selection-biased samples; causal effects need to be learned from surrogate experiments with imperfect compliance; and causal knowledge has to be extrapolated across structurally heterogeneous populations. A powerful and flexible causal inference framework is required in order to tackle all of these challenges, which plague essentially any data analysis to varying degrees. Building on the structural perspective on causality introduced by Haavelmo (1943) and the graph-theoretic approach proposed by Pearl (1995), the artificial intelligence (AI) literature has developed a wide array of techniques for causal inference that allow us to leverage information from various imperfect, heterogeneous, and biased data sources (Bareinboim and Pearl, 2016). In this paper, we review recent advances made in this literature that have the potential to contribute to econometric methodology along three broad dimensions. First, they provide a unified and comprehensive framework for causal learning, in which the above-mentioned problems can be addressed in generality. Second, due to their origin in AI, they come together with sound, efficient, and complete (to be formally defined) algorithmic criteria for automation of the corresponding identification task. And third, because of the nonparametric description of structural models that graph-theoretic approaches build on, they combine the analytical rigor of structural econometrics with the flexibility of the potential outcomes framework, and thus offer a valuable complement to these two literature streams.

On Becker’s Studies of Marijuana Use as an Example of Analytic Induction

Assessing the Unobserved: Enhancing Causal Inference in Sociology with Sensitivity Analysis

Steven D.Levitt's Research on the Economics of Crime:A Survey

Does Meta-induction Justify Induction: Or Maybe Something Else?

AI and Social Theory

Recent Developments in Causal Inference and Machine Learning

Analytic Criminology: Mechanisms and Methods in the Explanation of Crime and its Causes

Causal inference: critical developments, past and future

The Future of Indirect Evidence

Credible Causal Inference for Empirical Legal Studies

Remarks on the analysis of causal relationships in population research

Induction, Popper, and machine learning

AI Assurance using Causal Inference: Application to Public Policy

Artificial Intelligence And The Scientific Method: How To Cope With A Complete Oxymoron

How people reason with counterfactual and causal explanations for Artificial Intelligence decisions in familiar and unfamiliar domains

A Decision-Theoretic Model for Using Scientific Data

The Method of Critical AI Studies, A Propaedeutic

Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciences

Causal inference and data fusion in econometrics

Automated versus do-it-yourself methods for causal inference: Lessons learned from a data analysis competition

Psychology and AI at a Crossroads: How Might Complex Systems Explain Themselves?