Abstract:Causal mediation analysis techniques enable investigators to examine whether the effect of the exposure on an outcome is mediated by some intermediate variable. Motivated by a data example from epidemiology, we consider estimation of natural direct and indirect effects on a survival outcome. An important concern is bias from confounders that may be unmeasured. Estimating natural direct and indirect effects requires an elaborate series of assumptions in order to identify the target quantities. The analyst must carefully measure and adjust for important predictors of the exposure, mediator and outcome. Omitting important confounders may bias the results in a way that is difficult to predict. In recent years, several methods have been proposed to explore sensitivity to unmeasured confounding in mediation analysis. However, many of these methods limit complexity by relying on a handful of sensitivity parameters that are difficult to interpret, or alternatively, by assuming that specific patterns of unmeasured confounding are absent. Instead, we propose a simple Bayesian sensitivity analysis technique that is indexed by four bias parameters. Our method has the unique advantage that it is able to simultaneously assess unmeasured confounding in the mediator–outcome, exposure–outcome and exposure–mediator relationships. It is a natural Bayesian extension of the sensitivity analysis methodologies of VanderWeele, which have been widely used in the epidemiology literature. We present simulation findings, and additionally, we illustrate the method in an epidemiological study of mortality rates in criminal offenders from British Columbia.

Assessing the Unobserved: Enhancing Causal Inference in Sociology with Sensitivity Analysis

Flexible sensitivity analysis for causal inference in observational studies subject to unmeasured confounding

Sensitivity Analysis Without Assumptions

Real Effect or Bias? Good Practices for Evaluating the Robustness of Evidence From Comparative Observational Studies Through Quantitative Sensitivity Analysis for Unmeasured Confounding

Recent Developments in Causal Inference and Machine Learning

Sensitivity Analysis for Unmeasured Confounding in the Estimation of Marginal Causal Effects

Identification, Inference and Sensitivity Analysis for Causal Mediation Effects

Sensitivity analysis of unmeasured confounding in causal inference based on exponential tilting and super learner

Causal inference with missing exposure information: Methods and applications to an obstetric study.

Sensitivity analysis for causal decomposition analysis: Assessing robustness toward omitted variable bias

Distinguishing Between Mediators and Confounders is Important for the Causal Inference in Observational Studies

A Risk-Ratio-Based Marginal Sensitivity Model for Causal Effects in Observational Studies

Observational Causality Testing

Causal inference with observational data and unobserved confounding variables

Making sense of sensitivity: extending omitted variable bias

Design Sensitivity and Its Implications for Weighted Observational Studies

Detecting and Measuring Confounding Using Causal Mechanism Shifts

Bayesian sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding in causal mediation analysis

Doubly-Valid/Doubly-Sharp Sensitivity Analysis for Causal Inference with Unmeasured Confounding

Toward Unique and Unbiased Causal Effect Estimation From Data With Hidden Variables

Sensitivity analysis of the no-omitted confounder assumption in latent growth curve mediation models