Abstract:As a typical model organism, the nematode C. elegans detect and respond to diverse environmental stimuli, such as light, temperature, odors and chemicals. The underline neuronal circuitry has been defined by decades of work by C. elegans researchers. However, there’s no work done on its perception to acoustic vibration, which is a critical environmental cue in the natural habitat. For the first time, we quantified worm’s response to acoustic vibration with precisely controlled amplitude and frequency. In an isotropic environment, worm’s navigation can be described as a random walk. Periods of forward movements are interrupted by random reorientations. C. elegans respond to environmental cues by biasing its reorientations. In this work, we delivered acoustic wave with defined amplitude and frequency to freely moving C. elegans . A custom-built real-time computer vision system was used to record the movements of individual young adult worms navigating the agar surface. Data collected was analyzed using customized particle-tracking and shape analysis algorithms. To automatically flag reorientations, we considered both the posture of the animal and the movement of its center of mass. Rapid reorientations ( Ω turns or reversal-turns) were flagged when the heading change of the center of mass trajectory was > 60° over 1 second. It was found that worms reorientate more when sound is on and reorientate less when sound is off. To quantify animal’s response to acoustic wave, we defined a non-dimensional acoustic sensitive index according to the formula. The index approaches 0 or 1 if there is no response or big response, respectively. We tested animal’s response to acoustic wave of varying displacement amplitude and fixed frequency. It was found that the acoustic sensitive index is proportional to the displacement amplitude. However, when we further tested animal’s response to acoustic wave of fixed displacement amplitude and varying frequency, the data shows that the acoustic sensitive index first increases then decreases with the increase of frequency. To characterize the mechanical vibration of the agar surface during the acoustic stimuli, we used a laser vibrometer (Polytec). It was showed that there’s obvious response when the sound cause vibration is as low as ~200 nm. The vibration level is much lower than other mechanical stimuli, such as gentle hair touch or plate tapping, which were used for studying the mechanical sensation of C. elegans in most labs. Our results suggest that worm can sense acoustic vibration. It responds to acoustic vibration by biasing the reorientation rate during navigation. The acoustic sensitive index depends on the frequency and displacement amplitude of the acoustic wave. The vibration level C. elegans can sense is much lower than people normally thought. Our work laid the ground work for studying C. elegans acoustic sensation. It would be interesting to further understand the neural circuits and cellular mechanism of this behavior.

The nematode C. elegans senses airborne sound

Sensing of sound pressure gradients by C. elegans drives phonotaxis behavior

Effects of acoustic vibration on the reorientations of C.elegans

Effects of acoustic vibration on the reorientations of <italic>C. elegans</italic>

Effects of Acoustic Vibration on the Reorientations of &lt;italic&gt;c. Elegans&lt;/italic&gt;

Effects of acoustic vibration on the reorientationsof C. elegans

Sound response mediated by the TRP channels NOMPC, NANCHUNG, and INACTIVE in chordotonal organs of Drosophila larvae

The neural basis of Drosophila gravity-sensing and hearing

Behavioral adjustment of C . elegans to mechanosensory loss requires intact mechanosensory neurons

C. Elegans: Sensing the Low-Frequency Profile of Amplitude-Modulated Ultrasound

Evolution of lateralized gustation in nematodes

Acoustic sensitivity of fly antennae

Transcriptome Analyses Provide Insights into the Auditory Function in Trachemys scripta elegans

Evolution of directional hearing in moths via conversion of bat detection devices to asymmetric pressure gradient receivers

Dissecting the signaling mechanisms underlying recognition and preference of food odors

Chemosensory signal transduction in Caenorhabditis elegans

The mechanism for directional hearing in fish

What does a butterfly hear? Physiological characterization of auditory afferents in Morpho peleides (Nymphalidae)

Moth hearing and sound communication

Sex and species specific hearing mechanisms in mosquito flagellar ears

Organization of the auditory pathway in the thoracic ganglia of noctuid moths