Abstract:Although most binaural organisms locate sound sources using neurological structures to amplify the sounds they hear, some animals use mechanically coupled hearing organs instead. One of these animals, the parasitoid fly Ormia ochracea, has astoundingly accurate sound localization abilities. It can locate objects in the azimuthal plane with a precision of 2°, equal to that of humans, despite an intertympanal distance of only 0.5 mm, which is less than 1/100th of the wavelength of the sound emitted by the crickets that it parasitizes. O. ochracea accomplishes this feat via mechanically coupled tympana that interact with incoming acoustic pressure waves to amplify differences in the signals received at the two ears. In 1995, Miles et al. developed a model of hearing mechanics in O. ochracea that represents the tympana as flat, front-facing prosternal membranes, though they lie on a convex surface at an angle from the flies' frontal and transverse planes. The model works well for incoming sound angles less than ±30°, but suffers from reduced accuracy (up to 60% error) at higher angles when compared to response data acquired from O. ochracea specimens. Despite this limitation, it has been the basis for bio-inspired microphone designs for decades. Here, we present critical improvements to the classic O. ochracea hearing model based on information from three-dimensional reconstructions of O. ochracea's tympanal organ. We identified the orientation of the tympana with respect to a frontal plane and the azimuthal angle segment between the tympana as morphological features essential to the flies' auditory acuity, and hypothesized a differentiated mechanical response to incoming sound on the ipsi- and contralateral sides that depends on these features. To explore this, we incorporated spatially-varying model coefficients that represent this asymmetric response, making a new quasi-two-dimensional (q2D) model. The q2D model has high accuracy (average errors of under 10%) for all incoming sound angles. This improved biomechanical model may inform the design of new microscale directional microphones and other small-scale acoustic sensor systems.

What does a butterfly hear? Physiological characterization of auditory afferents in Morpho peleides (Nymphalidae)

Hearing in a diurnal, mute butterfly, Morpho peleides (Papilionoidea, Nymphalidae)

The physiology of insect auditory afferents

Intensity responses of the single auditory receptor of notodontid moths: a test of the peripheral interaction hypothesis in moth ears

Evolution of directional hearing in moths via conversion of bat detection devices to asymmetric pressure gradient receivers

Moth hearing and sound communication

Tympanal ears mediate male–male competition, courtship and mating success in Bicyclus anynana butterflies

Organization of the auditory pathway in the thoracic ganglia of noctuid moths

Sex and species specific hearing mechanisms in mosquito flagellar ears

Aquatic birds have middle ears adapted to amphibious lifestyles

Behavioural changes in aposematic Heliconius melpomene butterflies in response to their predatory bird calls

Acoustic sensitivity of fly antennae

Reconsidering tympanal-acoustic interactions leads to an improved model of auditory acuity in a parasitoid fly

The nematode C. elegans senses airborne sound

Sound response mediated by the TRP channels NOMPC, NANCHUNG, and INACTIVE in chordotonal organs of Drosophila larvae

Tiny spies: mosquito antennae are sensitive sensors for eavesdropping on frog calls

Caterpillar sonic defences: diversity of vocalisations in silk and hawk moth (Bombycoidea) larvae

Multielectrode array use in insect auditory neuroscience to unravel the spatio-temporal response pattern in the prothoracic ganglion of Mecopoda elongata

Auditory sensitivity and tympanic middle ear in a vocal and a non-vocal frog

Amphibious auditory evoked potentials in four North American Testudines genera spanning the aquatic–terrestrial spectrum

Specification of auditory sensitivity by Drosophila TRP channels