Abstract:As a typical model organism, the nematode C. elegans detect and respond to diverse environmental stimuli, such as light, temperature, odors and chemicals. The underline neuronal circuitry has been defined by decades of work by C. elegans researchers. However, there’s no work done on its perception to acoustic vibration, which is a critical environmental cue in the natural habitat. For the first time, we quantified worm’s response to acoustic vibration with precisely controlled amplitude and frequency. In an isotropic environment, worm’s navigation can be described as a random walk. Periods of forward movements are interrupted by random reorientations. C. elegans respond to environmental cues by biasing its reorientations. In this work, we delivered acoustic wave with defined amplitude and frequency to freely moving C. elegans . A custom-built real-time computer vision system was used to record the movements of individual young adult worms navigating the agar surface. Data collected was analyzed using customized particle-tracking and shape analysis algorithms. To automatically flag reorientations, we considered both the posture of the animal and the movement of its center of mass. Rapid reorientations ( Ω turns or reversal-turns) were flagged when the heading change of the center of mass trajectory was > 60° over 1 second. It was found that worms reorientate more when sound is on and reorientate less when sound is off. To quantify animal’s response to acoustic wave, we defined a non-dimensional acoustic sensitive index according to the formula. The index approaches 0 or 1 if there is no response or big response, respectively. We tested animal’s response to acoustic wave of varying displacement amplitude and fixed frequency. It was found that the acoustic sensitive index is proportional to the displacement amplitude. However, when we further tested animal’s response to acoustic wave of fixed displacement amplitude and varying frequency, the data shows that the acoustic sensitive index first increases then decreases with the increase of frequency. To characterize the mechanical vibration of the agar surface during the acoustic stimuli, we used a laser vibrometer (Polytec). It was showed that there’s obvious response when the sound cause vibration is as low as ~200 nm. The vibration level is much lower than other mechanical stimuli, such as gentle hair touch or plate tapping, which were used for studying the mechanical sensation of C. elegans in most labs. Our results suggest that worm can sense acoustic vibration. It responds to acoustic vibration by biasing the reorientation rate during navigation. The acoustic sensitive index depends on the frequency and displacement amplitude of the acoustic wave. The vibration level C. elegans can sense is much lower than people normally thought. Our work laid the ground work for studying C. elegans acoustic sensation. It would be interesting to further understand the neural circuits and cellular mechanism of this behavior.

Sound response mediated by the TRP channels NOMPC, NANCHUNG, and INACTIVE in chordotonal organs of Drosophila larvae

Mechanically evoked spike responses of pentascolopidial chordotonal organs of Drosophila melanogaster larvae

Drosophila mechanical nociceptors preferentially sense localized poking

Nanchung and Inactive define pore properties of the native auditory transduction channel in Drosophila

A TRPV family ion channel required for hearing in Drosophila

Specification of auditory sensitivity by Drosophila TRP channels

Identification of Potential Mechanosensitive Ion Channels Involved in Texture Discrimination Duringdrosophila Suzukiiegg-Laying Behaviour

Sensing of sound pressure gradients by C. elegans drives phonotaxis behavior

Drosophila NOMPC is a mechanotransduction channel subunit for gentle-touch sensation

A Defensive Kicking Behavior in Response to Mechanical Stimuli Mediated Bydrosophilawing Margin Bristles

The neural basis of Drosophila gravity-sensing and hearing

Mechanical Nociception Assay in Drosophila Larvae

The nematode C. elegans senses airborne sound

A Defensive Kicking Behavior in Response to Mechanical Stimuli Mediated by Drosophila Wing Margin Bristles

Sensory Integration and Neuromodulatory Feedback Facilitate Drosophila Mechanonociceptive Behavior.

Molecular Basis for Cephalic Mechanosensitivity of Drosophila Larvae

Shear stress activates nociceptors to drive Drosophila mechanical nociception

Effects of acoustic vibration on the reorientations of <italic>C. elegans</italic>

Response Plasticity of Drosophila Olfactory Sensory Neurons

Nociception in Drosophila Larvae

Mechanosensory circuits coordinate two opposing motor actions in Drosophila feeding.