(Re)conceptualising risk: left numb and unengaged and lost in a no‐man’s‐land or what (seems to) work for at‐risk students

David Zyngier
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13603110902781427
2011-03-01
International Journal of Inclusive Education
Abstract:This review of current research into at‐risk programmes serves to categorise and characterise existing programmes and to evaluate the contribution of these programmes to assisting students at risk from marginalised backgrounds. This characterisation questions the (sometimes) implicit assumptions and the consequences of those assumptions inherent in and behind these various accounts. Using as a lens the (various and varied) understandings of social justice and the goals of education, the author identifies three sometimes overlapping and sometimes contesting standpoints in relation to at‐risk students, characterised as instrumentalist or rational technical, social constructivist or individualist, and critical transformative or empowering. It is argued that a critical transformative understanding of risk may deliver improved outcomes for young people by challenging ‘the school context in which the young people are located’.
education & educational research
What problem does this paper attempt to address?