Abstract:Absolute rates of violence in mental disorders are low and people with mental illness are similarly likely to be victims as perpetrators of violence [1][2][3] . Violence associated with mental illness is however clinically relevant, as the risk is raised for people with certain mental illnesses relative to the general population [4][5][6] . Violence is an important outcome both for individuals and from a public health perspective 7 . Human costs include physical and psychological harms to victims and their families, and negative health, social and criminal justice consequences for perpetrators, such as those resulting from having a criminal conviction 8,9 . Direct economic costs to health systems result from activities such as mandatory or more intensive treatment, with indirect costs accruing to other systems, such as the criminal justice apparatus and across wider society, for example due to lost productivity 10 .While there is evidence that treating mental illness can reduce the risk of violence, it is a complex relationship with multiple causations [11][12][13][14] . This necessitates a holistic approach to assessment and management that considers individual symptoms, behaviours, interpersonal relationships and social context 15 . A better understanding of causal pathways to violence in those with mental illness would enable preventive measures to be developed and appropriately targeted 16 . Risk assessment tools could allow insights from epidemiological studies to be operationalised to assist professionals in making more informed decisions across a range of clinical and other settings 17,18 . New strategies to reduce aggression are needed and must be robustly evaluated, such as through appropriately designed clinical trials 19 .This research topic brings together five papers examining many of these elements. It spans from investigations of how early childhood experiences relate to adult aggression, to an examination of the characteristics of people receiving mandatory treatment in China.Recognising that the origin of aggression may lie in our early experiences, Koolschijn et al. studied the effect of childhood maltreatment on several outcomes, including aggression, in a sample of 128 forensic psychiatric patients 20 . These authors found that higher scores on measures of childhood maltreatment were associated with higher aggression and violence risk assessment scores. They highlight the need to consider a patient's history of maltreatment to guide risk assessment and treatment approaches. Notably, the presence and severity of childhood maltreatment is found to be a risk factor for violence and offending in the general population, as well as in clinical samples. This association has public health implications for prevention and early intervention, as initiatives to combat child maltreatment could be effective at reducing levels of aggression at a population level [21][22][23] . Schizophrenia is a condition with higher rates of violence compared to the general population, as well as to other forms of mental disorder 4 . Sagayadevan et al. explored how schizophrenia symptom severity could mediate the relationship between aggression, impulsivity and quality of life outcomes in a sample of 397 mental health outpatients with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders in Singapore. Their analysis found indirect associations between motor impulsivity and self-control with various aspects of quality of life, through symptom severity. This helps elucidate one possible pathway by which impulsivity may impact on quality of life in this population.A key step in reducing violent outcomes for clinical populations is to more readily and consistently integrate knowledge of predictors of violence into clinical practice to better individualise treatment [24][25][26] . To do this effectively we need to have robustly validated risk prediction models tailored to the populations they are used in 27 . Roaldset et al. validated a new violence risk screening tool for young people called V-RISK-Y, adapted from the well-established V-RISK-10 for adults 28,29 . They found V-RISK-Y had an Area Under the Curve of 0.762 for violent behaviour in 67 adolescents admitted to a Norwegian emergency department. V-RISK-Y was also liked by staff who used it. The authors suggest changes to V-RISK-Y and propose further research to evaluate the revised tool.An important issue relating to violence in psychiatric inpatient settings is the associated use of restrictive interventions 30 . Whilst sometimes essential for safety, the practice raises ethical issues and there is increasing emphasis on minimising its use. Hirsch et al. investigated whether implementing new guidelines reduced coercion in German psychiatric wards. The paper presented here as part of the PreVCo randomised controlled trial 31 , examines the baseline characteristics of 55 wards randomly allocated in matched pairs to the new guidelines or -Abstract Truncated-

Reimagining risk assessment: Comment on Viljoen and Vincent (2020).

A Commentary on Statistical Assessment of Violence Recidivism Risk

Too risky to use, or too risky not to? Lessons learned from over 30 years of research on forensic risk assessment with Indigenous persons.

Violence risk assessment instruments in forensic psychiatric populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Attitudes of nurses and nurse managers towards violence risk assessment and management: A cross‐sectional study in psychiatric inpatient settings

Risk assessment matters, but only when implemented well: A multisite study in juvenile probation

[Risk management of violence: a core professional activity of every psychiatrist]

Are risk assessment tools more accurate than unstructured judgments in predicting violent, any, and sexual offending? A meta-analysis of direct comparison studies

Assessing Risk Assessment in Action

Violence Risk Assessment Tools: A Systematic Review of Surveys

Risk Assessment Interviews: Exploring the Perspectives of Psychologists and Indeterminate Sentenced Prisoners in the United Kingdom

Dynamic violence risk, protective factors, and therapeutic change in a gender and ethnoculturally diverse sample of court-adjudicated youth.

Approaches and challenges to assessing risk of violence in first episode psychosis: A qualitative interview study of clinicians, patients and carers

Judging risk: key determinants in British domestic violence cases

The Risk Screener Violence (RS-V): retrospective prediction of violent and aggressive incidents within the prison setting

A Second Proof of Concept Investigation of Strengths Using the Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth Tool With Justice-Involved Youth: Item Level Risk-Based Effects and Interactions

Dynamic risk factors reassessed regularly after release from incarceration predict imminent violent recidivism.

The predictive validity of the V-RISK-10 and BVC among involuntarily admitted patients

Editorial: Assessment and management in violence and aggression

Reducing Risk for Future Violence From Forensic Psychiatric Patients by Using Critical Factors of the Short-Term Assessment of Risk and Treatability as a Caring Tool

How the risk principle reduces recidivism: The impact of legislative revisions on the release and reoffense rates of individuals convicted of sexual offenses.