Contesting the framing of digital risk: An analysis of Australian children's experiences
Hannah Soong,Sue Nichols,Karen Dooley,Michelle M. Neumann
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2024.2402271
IF: 2.716
2024-09-20
Journal of Children and Media
Abstract:Children's social lives are mediated increasingly by digital tools, thereby making new modes of home-school-world relationships possible. In this context, children's digital out-of-school social practices continue to be associated with risk. Children are construed as an "at risk" and vulnerable population by adults who frame children's everyday digital social life with ambivalence. This framing is used to justify imposition of constraints in the present, with children's digital engagement a key site of regulation. The study we report here problematises research that separates risk from children's digital social participation. To challenge dominant views of children being vulnerable to risk, we use Actor Network Theory to provide a nuanced exposition of concepts of "digital risk" and agentic self, relevant to children's digital social lives. From the findings of the present study, involving 62 10–11-year-old children in 3 Australian schools, we argue that "digital risk" framing of children's social lives underplays children's agency and voice in digital environments. Additionally, what is missing in the framing of digital risk is recognition that children utilise digital tools to ameliorate non-digital risk. In other words, risk is not only digital; and there is more to digital participation than risk. Prior State of Knowledge: Children's social lives are mediated increasingly by digital tools and digital practices that continue to be associated with risks. This framing justifies children's digital engagement as a site of regulation as children are continually construed as an "at risk" population. Novel Contributions: A new way of framing "digital risk" is offered which incorporates children's perspectives on digital experiences. Children can create diverse types of digital social practices in relation to perceived and experienced risk, acting to strengthen their navigation of digital risk. Practical Implications: Adults need to rethink what "digital risk" means in terms of affording opportunities for children's social development. Parents are best placed to support children's agency through online experiences, whilst guiding children through the challenges and benefits of digital risk.
social sciences, interdisciplinary,communication
What problem does this paper attempt to address?