Abstract:American democracy is struggling. Political polarization has exacerbated division within the electorate, while gerrymandering and hyper-polarization mean only a handful of elections are truly competitive. Voters feel increasingly disenchanted with the major parties and starved for choice. Hungry for solutions, states have turned to a particular form of Ranked Choice Voting called Instant Runoff Voting, now adopted in two states and on the ballot on more this fall. Its promise of greater choice holds intuitive appeal to those interested in improving American democratic institutions.This article sounds the alarm that the rush to reform by adopting Instant Runoff Voting may prove misguided. Well-intentioned advocates have backed a system that treats symptoms, not the root causes of democratic disfunction. We reframe the discussion in terms of robust electoral competition, evaluating voting systems on their incentive structures shaping the political positioning of candidates’ platforms and the extent to which those platforms are responsive to the will of the voters. On those metrics, we argue, the form of Ranked Choice Voting spreading across the country comes up short in much the same ways that our current plurality system fails.We provide a two-part corrective. On a theoretical level, we offer a framework that ties the representativeness of an electoral system to the degree to which it promotes political competition. We show how alternative voting systems can create stronger competitive pressures resulting in more representative election outcomes. On a practical level, we show an alternative Ranked Choice system called Condorcet voting could restore lost incentives within existing constraints. Unlike our current plurality system or Instant Runoff Voting, Condorcet voting ensures that a candidate preferred by a majority over others must win, thereby creating strong competitive pressures resulting in more representative outcomes. We map a feasible path toward revived democratic responsiveness.

Minimalinvasiv oder wirksam? Debattenbeitrag zur Novellierung des Bundeswahlrechts vom Oktober 2020

THE PARTY AND POLITICAL LANDSCAPE OF GERMANY AFTER THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT ELECTIONS

Die Europawahl 2024 – systemische Besonderheiten, Erwartungen und die extremistische Herausforderung

Die bayerische Landtagswahl vom 8. Oktober 2023: Votum für Kontinuität der schwarz-orangenen Koalition

Why Majority Judgement is not yet the solution for political elections, but can help finding it

The Schulze Method of Voting

Do voters choose rationally, irrationally or at random? Data and theory for proportional elections

Voting power and Qualified Majority Voting with a "no vote" option

Invariably Suboptimal - An attempt to improve the voting rules of Treaties of Nice and Lisbon

Robust Electoral Competition: Rethinking Electoral Systems to Encourage Representative Outcomes

Was misst der Wahl-O-Mat

Many losers – One winner? An examination of vote switching to the AfD in the 2017 German federal election using VAA data

The grundgesetz after 50 years: Analysing changes in the German constitution

Alternatives to plurality rule for single-winner elections: When do they make a difference?

Vulnerability of democratic electoral systems

KOALA: A new paradigm for election coverage

Improving the Explanation of Electoral Behavior Through a Combination of Historical and Local Context – The Case of the AfD’s Results at the Federal Election in Germany in 2017

Reform of Election System of Member of the National Assembly

Fair votes in practice

NOT MUCH ADO ABOUT QUITE A LOT? THE GERMAN ELECTION OF SEPTEMBER 2013

Are Weighted Games Sufficiently Good for Binary Voting?