Abstract:American democracy is struggling. Political polarization has exacerbated division within the electorate, while gerrymandering and hyper-polarization mean only a handful of elections are truly competitive. Voters feel increasingly disenchanted with the major parties and starved for choice. Hungry for solutions, states have turned to a particular form of Ranked Choice Voting called Instant Runoff Voting, now adopted in two states and on the ballot on more this fall. Its promise of greater choice holds intuitive appeal to those interested in improving American democratic institutions.This article sounds the alarm that the rush to reform by adopting Instant Runoff Voting may prove misguided. Well-intentioned advocates have backed a system that treats symptoms, not the root causes of democratic disfunction. We reframe the discussion in terms of robust electoral competition, evaluating voting systems on their incentive structures shaping the political positioning of candidates’ platforms and the extent to which those platforms are responsive to the will of the voters. On those metrics, we argue, the form of Ranked Choice Voting spreading across the country comes up short in much the same ways that our current plurality system fails.We provide a two-part corrective. On a theoretical level, we offer a framework that ties the representativeness of an electoral system to the degree to which it promotes political competition. We show how alternative voting systems can create stronger competitive pressures resulting in more representative election outcomes. On a practical level, we show an alternative Ranked Choice system called Condorcet voting could restore lost incentives within existing constraints. Unlike our current plurality system or Instant Runoff Voting, Condorcet voting ensures that a candidate preferred by a majority over others must win, thereby creating strong competitive pressures resulting in more representative outcomes. We map a feasible path toward revived democratic responsiveness.

Vulnerability of democratic electoral systems

On the Robustness of Democratic Electoral Processes to Computational Propaganda

Vulnerability analysis of three remote voting methods

Voting Systems with Trust Mechanisms in Cyberspace: Vulnerabilities and Defenses

Distributed, End-to-end Verifiable, and Privacy-Preserving Internet Voting Systems

Geometric vulnerability of democratic institutions against lobbying: a sociophysics approach

Electronic Voting Systems - From Theory to Implementation.

A systems framework for remedying dysfunction in U.S. democracy

D-DEMOS: A Distributed, End-to-end Verifiable, Internet Voting System

Measure and collapse of participatory democracy in a two-party system

Elections in the Post-Quantum Era: Is the Complexity Shield Strong Enough?

Designing Stable Elections: A Survey

Robust Electoral Competition: Rethinking Electoral Systems to Encourage Representative Outcomes

The principal components of electoral regimes -- Separating autocracies from pseudo-democracies

Electoral surveys influence on the voting processes: a cellular automata model

Alternatives to plurality rule for single-winner elections: When do they make a difference?

The Proportional Electoral Systems in the Western Balkans Countries: A Comparative Approach

Microtargeting, voters’ unawareness, and democracy

Why Majority Judgement is not yet the solution for political elections, but can help finding it

Electric Democracy: Proof of Work to secure Elections