In Vivo Regeneration of Complex Cartilage/bone Defect Using Biomimetic Scaffolds
Du Yingying,Liu Haoming,Wang Jianglin,Yang Qin,Shuang Jiaqi,Zhang Shengmin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/conf.fbioe.2016.01.00977
IF: 5.7
2016-01-01
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Abstract:Event Abstract Back to Event In vivo regeneration of complex cartilage/bone defect using biomimetic scaffolds Yingying Du1, Haoming Liu1, Jianglin Wang2, Qin Yang1, Jiaqi Shuang1 and Shengmin Zhang1 1 Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Advanced Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering Center, China 2 UniversityofOklahoma, Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, United States Introduction: Due to the complex structure of the osteochondral interface, highly bioinspired scaffolds with continuous gradients in properties are needed as potential repair grafts [1],[2]. In this work, a novel multilayer scaffold with continuous HA gradient was well designed for osteochondral repair and fabricated by microsphere-based selective laser sintering (SLS), using PCL and HA/PCL microspheres. Materials and Methods: PCL and HA/PCL composite microspheres were prepared using modified S/O/W emulsion solvent evaporation method [3]. A cylindrical scaffold of 4 mm in diameter and 2.8 mm in thickness was designed via Pro/Engineer 3D modeling software and fabricated by SLS, with the HA content continuously increasing from 0 to 30%, from top to bottom. Rat bone mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) were used to evaluate the in vitro cytocompatibility. A critical sized osteochondral defect in rabbit was created to evaluate the in vivo repair, using micro-CT and histological analysis. Results and Discussion: The novel multilayer scaffolds with interconnected pores and moderate mechanical property were demonstrated to be suitable for cell adhesion and proliferation in vitro. For osteochondral repair in vivo, the subchondral bone was considered as the key foundation for successful cartilage repair. In our study, the microspheres-based HA/PCL bony phase effectively facilitated the new bone formation compared to the PCL group. After 6 weeks, new bone has formed at the bottom of the implanted multilayer scaffold. After 12 weeks, abundant new bone filled the subchondral area with obvious vascularization. Moreover, the new bone integrated well with the adjacent tissue, providing a strong mechanical supporting for the defect area. The rapid and sufficient regeneration of subchondral bone may further significantly improve the repair of cartilage. Completely different cartilage repair was observed for the two kinds of scaffold. The defect implanted with the multilayer scaffold was repaired with zonal hyaline cartilage, however, inferior repair with fibrous tissue and fibrocartilage in the chondral area was observed in the PCL scaffold. Conclusion: Combining the microsphere-based SLS technology and the strategy of continuous gradient scaffold, the current study designed and fabricated a novel multilayer scaffold with continuous HA gradient, with demonstrated great potential for osteochondral repair. References:[1] Dormer NH, Singh M, Zhao L, Mohan N, Berkland CJ, Detamore MS. Osteochondral interface regeneration of the rabbit knee with macroscopic gradients of bioactive signals. Journal Of Biomedical Materials Research Part A. 2012;100A:162-70.[2] Lopa S, Madry H. Bioinspired scaffolds for osteochondral regeneration. Tissue engineering Part A. 2014;20:2052-76.[3] Du Y, Liu H, Shuang J, Wang J, Ma J, Zhang S. Microsphere-based selective laser sintering for building macroporous bone scaffolds with controlled microstructure and excellent biocompatibility. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2015. Keywords: Biomimetic, material design, 3D scaffold, in vivo tissue engineering Conference: 10th World Biomaterials Congress, Montréal, Canada, 17 May - 22 May, 2016. Presentation Type: Poster Topic: Biomimetic materials Citation: Du Y, Liu H, Wang J, Yang Q, Shuang J and Zhang S (2016). In vivo regeneration of complex cartilage/bone defect using biomimetic scaffolds. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. Conference Abstract: 10th World Biomaterials Congress. doi: 10.3389/conf.FBIOE.2016.01.00977 Copyright: The abstracts in this collection have not been subject to any Frontiers peer review or checks, and are not endorsed by Frontiers. They are made available through the Frontiers publishing platform as a service to conference organizers and presenters. The copyright in the individual abstracts is owned by the author of each abstract or his/her employer unless otherwise stated. Each abstract, as well as the collection of abstracts, are published under a Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 (attribution) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) and may thus be reproduced, translated, adapted and be the subject of derivative works provided the authors and Frontiers are attributed. For Frontiers’ terms and conditions please see https://www.frontiersin.org/legal/terms-and-conditions. Received: 27 Mar 2016; Published Online: 30 Mar 2016. Login Required This action requires you to be registered with Frontiers and logged in. To register or login click here. Abstract Info Abstract The Authors in Frontiers Yingying Du Haoming Liu Jianglin Wang Qin Yang Jiaqi Shuang Shengmin Zhang Google Yingying Du Haoming Liu Jianglin Wang Qin Yang Jiaqi Shuang Shengmin Zhang Google Scholar Yingying Du Haoming Liu Jianglin Wang Qin Yang Jiaqi Shuang Shengmin Zhang PubMed Yingying Du Haoming Liu Jianglin Wang Qin Yang Jiaqi Shuang Shengmin Zhang Related Article in Frontiers Google Scholar PubMed Abstract Close Back to top Javascript is disabled. Please enable Javascript in your browser settings in order to see all the content on this page.