Abstract:In their stimulating discussion of monkey communication and socialisation, Cheney & Seyfarth (C & S) mention autism as an example of the dissociation possible between social and nonsocial intelligence (p. 270). We would like to suggest that autism is also an important example for many of the other points raised in this excellent book. Although the authors suggest a parallel between vervet and normal human infant communication (p. 173), an even more informative analogy can be made with the abilities and handicaps of people with autism. These individuals suffer from a circumscribed brain abnormality (from a variety of biological causes) that affects development from birth. The basis of their handicap is a specific cognitive disorder that results in the absence of theory of mind. This in turn leads to specific impairments in imagination, socialisation, and communication (Frith 1989). We raise only a few points here that arise from our explanation of the three core features of autism and relate to issues in primate research. Pretence. One area where monkeys are more like autistic children than like normal infants, or Down syndrome children, is pretence. C & S conclude that there is little good evidence of pretence in monkeys. Autistic people unlike normal two-yearolds also fail to show pretend play (Wulff 1985). It was this observation that was crucial in suggesting that autistic people might also lack a theory of mind, because both require the ability to represent mental states (Leslie 1987). Socialisation. The hypothesis that autistic people like C & S's vervets lack a theory of mind, can account well for the core handicaps of autism. Like monkeys, however, autistic people are capable of social skills that do not involve a theory of mind. So, for example, autistic children can use sabotage (manipulation of behavior) to achieve a desired end, although they cannot use deception (manipulation of beliefs, Russell et al. 1991; Sodian & Frith, in press). Primates, too, probably manipulate behaviour rather than mental states. Sabotage is seen, for example, in the bonobos who removed the means of escape from the moat to leave individuals below stranded (p. 211). Such behaviour seems to indicate an understanding of goal-directedness, and a parallel, rudimentary understanding of desires as drives seems to be present in autism (Baron-Cohen 1991a; Tan & Harris 1990). Autistic people can also understand and manipulate seeing (Hobson 1984; Leslie & Frith 1988) in much the same way a monkey or ape may be able to conceal information, for example, by hiding from dominant males behind a rock before grooming a subordinate male (p. 191). Communication. C & S make a distinction between "calls that provide information only about the signaller's emotional state or subsequent behaviour . . . and calls that denote a specific external referent" (p. 104). This is clearly a useful distinction when the signaller's intention to signal is in question, but it may be that the distinction becomes less useful when dealing with deliberate communication such as the vervets' vocalisations. Here a distinction between internal (as cognitively simple) and external (as more complex) referents could be -misleading. Confusion could arise because the two categories above overlap with two very different categories that have been found to be useful in looking at the quality of autistic communication. Expressive versus instrumental communication. In autistic people it has been fruitful to examine whether the gestures and speech produced are protodeclarative or protoimperative. Protodeclarative gestures indicate an external referent to communicate something about the signaller's internal state ("Look at that bird; I'm interested in it!"). Protoimperatives, on the other hand, indicate an external referent to achieve a behavioural end ("Look at that bird; give it to me!"). The cognitive and social sophistication underlying these two categories, however, is precisely the reverse of that ascribed to C & S's classes protodeclaratives are more advanced because they require a theory of mind. Not surprisingly, then, protoimperative pointing is understood and used by autistic children, but protodeclarative pointing is not (Baron-Cohen 1989b). Similarly, autistic children use instrumental gestures but not expressive gestures (Attwood et al. 1988). Ostensive versus coded communication. The protodeclarative/ protoimperative distinction is also related to the distinction between ostensive-inferential communication and coded com-

Autologous platelet-rich plasma and fibrin-augmented minced cartilage implantation in chondral lesions of the knee leads to good clinical and radiological outcomes after more than 12 months: A retrospective cohort study of 71 patients

Clinical application and research of autologous chondrocyte implant

Minced Autologous Chondral Fragments with Fibrin Glue as a Simple Promising One-Step Cartilage Repair Procedure: A Clinical and MRI Study at 12-Month Follow-Up

easyCapstone: A framework for managing and assessing capstone design projects

Arthroscopic Implantation of a Cell-Free Bilayer Scaffold for the Treatment of Knee Chondral Lesions: A 2-Year Prospective Study

Therapy of experimental brucella infection in the developing chick embryo; the synergistic action of streptomycin and sulfadiazine.

An Audit of Treatment of Genital Warts: Opening the Feedback Loop

One-stage cartilage repair using the autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis combined with simultaneous use of autologous adipose tissue graft and adipose tissue mesenchymal cells technique: clinical results and magnetic resonance imaging evaluation at five-year follow-up

One-Step Cartilage Repair of Full-Thickness Knee Chondral Lesions Using a Hyaluronic Acid–Based Scaffold Embedded With Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate: Long-term Outcomes After Mean Follow-up Duration of 14 Years

Significant improvements in clinical outcome measures and patient satisfaction after combined all‐arthroscopic meniscal allograft transplantation and autologous chondrocyte implantation: A single‐centre longitudinal study

Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis induced by sorafenib.

Autologous chondrocyte implantation for knee cartilage injuries: moderate functional outcome and performance in patients with high-impact activities

Early Efficacy of Type I Collagen-Based Matrix-Assisted Autologous Chondrocyte Transplantation for the Treatment of Articular Cartilage Lesions

CDR molecular localization of possible anti-idiotypic anti-DNA antibodies in normal subjects, patients with SLE, and SLE first-degree relatives.

Treatment of Large Cartilage Defects in the Knee by Hydrogel-Based Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation: Two-Year Results of a Prospective, Multicenter, Single-Arm Phase III Trial

Autologous bone grafting in combination with autologous chondrocyte implantation yields favourable outcomes in the treatment of osteochondral defects of the knee: A systematic literature review

Paper 43: Long-term Outcomes of an All-Arthroscopic Matrix-Assisted Autologous Chondrocyte Transplantation Technique

Acellular Aragonite-Based Scaffold for the Treatment of Joint Surface Lesions of the Knee: A Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up Study

Cheney & Seyfarth : How monkeys see the world e How autistics see the world

Hydrogel-Based Matrix-Associated Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation Shows Greater Substantial Clinical Benefit at 24 Months Follow-Up than Microfracture: A Propensity Score Matched-Pair Analysis

Chondrogenesis with Stem Cells in Massive Chondral Defects: A Randomized Controlled Trial