Abstract:Purpose: To determine clinical and functional outcomes in patients treated with autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) or osteochondral allograft (OCA) transplantation for chondral defects secondary to patellar instability with concomitant medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction and tibial tubercle osteotomy (TTO) for patellar realignment. Methods: A retrospective review identified patients who underwent ACI or OCA transplantation with concomitant MPFL reconstruction and TTO. Patients were excluded if they did not have concomitant MPFL reconstruction and TTO, had the presence of other intra-articular pathologies, or failed to complete postoperative subjective outcome evaluations at a minimum of 2 years following surgery. Subjective outcome measures included the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement, International Knee Documentation Committee evaluation, and 12-item Short Form Health Survey physical scores, collected a minimum of 2 years after surgery. Defect location, size, complications, and rate of subsequent surgery were determined. Results: Eighteen total patients were included in this study. The ACI cohort included 11 patients with 13 total defects that were treated with ACI. The OCA cohort included 7 patients with 10 total defects that were treated with OCA. This was due to a number of patients in either group having multiple cartilage defects. Twenty-three total chondral defects were compared to analyze clinical and functional outcomes following surgical correction (ACI: n = 13, OCA: n = 10). Five defects were noted on the femoral condyle and 18 on the patellar facets/central ridge. Defects were comparable between groups, including size measured during index arthroscopy (ACI = 3.34 cm2 [95% CI, 2.3-4.4 cm2] vs OCA = 4.03 cm2 [95% CI, 3.1-5.0 cm2]; P = .351), Outerbridge classification (ACI = 54.8% grade 4 vs OCA = 60.0% grade 4; P ≥ .999), and Area Measurement and Depth Underlying Structures score (ACI = 47.1 vs OCA = 58.6; P = .298). Postoperative outcomes were comparable, including revision rate (ACI = 15.4% vs OCA = 10.0%; P ≥ .999) and 2-year International Knee Documentation Committee scores (ACI = 74.2 [95% CI, 65.2-83.2] vs OCA = 51.2 [95% CI, 30.3-72.1]; P = .077). ACI did have significantly higher 2-year Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (85.1 [95% CI, 76.9-93.3] vs 63.7 [95% CI, 49.1-78.3]; P = .031) and 12-item Short Form Health Survey scores (54.1 [95% CI, 52.0-56.2] vs 42.6 [95% CI, 35.8-49.4]; P = .007) compared to OCA. Conclusions: ACI or OCA transplantation for chondral defects with concomitant MPFL reconstruction and TTO can be safely performed in an outpatient setting with functional and clinical outcomes being comparable. Level of evidence: Level III, retrospective case series study.

Autologous bone grafting in combination with autologous chondrocyte implantation yields favourable outcomes in the treatment of osteochondral defects of the knee: A systematic literature review

Clinical application and research of autologous chondrocyte implant

The role of autologous bone grafting in matrix‐associated autologous chondrocyte implantation at the knee: Results from the German Cartilage Registry (KnorpelRegister DGOU)

Autologous platelet-rich plasma and fibrin-augmented minced cartilage implantation in chondral lesions of the knee leads to good clinical and radiological outcomes after more than 12 months: A retrospective cohort study of 71 patients

Autologous chondrocyte implantation, matrix‐induced autologous chondrocyte implantation, osteochondral autograft transplantation and osteochondral allograft improve knee function and pain with considerations for patient and cartilage defects characteristics: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Microfractures, autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis, osteochondral autograft transplantation and autologous chondrocyte implantation for knee chondral defects: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

A systematic review on Autologous Matrix Induced Chondrogenesis (AMIC) for chondral knee defects

Significant improvements in clinical outcome measures and patient satisfaction after combined all‐arthroscopic meniscal allograft transplantation and autologous chondrocyte implantation: A single‐centre longitudinal study

Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation in the Patellofemoral Joint: A Systematic Review

Osteochondral Autograft Transplantation or Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation for Large Cartilage Defects of the Knee: a Meta-Analysis.

The operative treatment of full thickness cartilage defects in the knee joint with autologous chondrocyte transplantation

Comparable Outcomes Between Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation and Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation in the Setting of Patellar Realignment

Arthroscopic autologous osteochondral grafting for cartilage defects of the knee: prospective study results at a minimum 7-year follow-up

Secondary matrix‐associated autologous chondrocyte implantation after failed cartilage repair shows superior results when combined with autologous bone grafting: Findings from the German Cartilage Registry (KnorpelRegister DGOU)

Autologous chondrocyte implantation for knee cartilage injuries: moderate functional outcome and performance in patients with high-impact activities

Arthroscopic Autologous Minced Cartilage Implantation of Cartilage Defects in the Knee: A 2-Year Follow-up of 62 Patients

Comparative Efficacy of Osteochondral Autologous Transplantation and Microfracture in the Knee: an Updated Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Autologous chondrocyte implantation provides good long-term clinical results in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review

Chondrogenesis with Stem Cells in Massive Chondral Defects: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Editorial Commentary: Long-Term Outcomes of Autologous Osteochondral Transfer of the Knee Are Successful and Predicated Upon Appropriate Patient Selection

The effect of autologous adipose derived mesenchymal stem cell therapy in the treatment of a large osteochondral defect of the knee following unsuccessful surgical intervention of osteochondritis dissecans – a case study