Abstract:The relationship between the individual and society is the leitmotif of Georges Gurvitch’s work. Beginning from the early Russian-language books on the philosophy of law and ending with the works on sociology published in France and the USA at the final stage of his career, Gurvitch studied the individual person and collective units as interacting sides of the collective social subject. He sought to overcome the struggle between individualism and collectivism which found its ideological expression in the rivalry of the French (Emile Durkheim) and German (Max Weber) schools of sociology. Gurvitch formulated the concept of society as dynamic interaction and mutual determination of the individual and collective unit. In his Russian-language works, written before his emigration, he maintained that it was in the sphere of law that one could determine how the individual and society mutually condition each other and determine the direction of social development. In the late 1920s and early 1930s in his teaching on social law, Gurvitch formulated the concept of sociability which enabled him to focus attention not on the confrontation, but on the interaction of the individual and society. In the concept of “normative fact” he defined the being of society and embodied the dialectical interaction between singularity and multitude. In the late 1930s in his teaching on microsociology, he introduced criteria of sociability, recording individual (intensity of the fusion of individual minds) and collective (the force of social pressure) aspects of the process of social development. Proceeding from these criteria Gurvitch developed a gradation of sociability, expressing it in the scheme “mass — community — communion” which enabled him to analyse the formation of collective units and determine the features of their existence. In his article “Mass, Community, and Communion” (1941) he presented the forms of sociability which enabled him to describe the mutual conditioning of individuals and collective units. Gurvitch’s article spells out the key principles of his philosophy and sociology of law which overcome individualism and collectivism in his account of society.

The Development of K. Kurauchi's Sociology

Evolution of the Concept of “Personal”and the Spirit of the Age——From“the Abstract Person”to“Realistic Individual”and “Civil Society”

Sociology of the Japanese, by the Japanese, for the Japanese: A short history of unintentional indigenization of sociology in Japan

Social Factors in E. Durkheim's Theory

Sociology of ritual and narrative as post-Western sociology: from the perspective of Confucianism and Nativism in the Edo period of Japan

A Shift towards Individual’s Standpoint in Sociology

Chinese sociology:Its Pursuit of Value and Theoretical Visions

Contemporary Mission of Chinese Sociology

Another Critique of Modernity:The Relation Between Individuality and Sociality in Durkheimian Sociology

Work, Self, and Society: A Socio-historical Study of Morita Therapy

Contention on the Development of Cultural Sociology:Concept, Relation and Cerebration

Cases of Indiscriminate Killing and Society: Toward a Sociological Analysis of Curvatures in Contemporary Society

On Meta and Basic Issues of Sociology--Logic Structural Elements and Specific Historical Process of the Matter Concerning Relation Between the Individual and Society

The Relationship Between the Individual and the Collective in the Social Philosophy of Georges Gurvitch

Seiji Mochizuki’s Studies on Marx’Historical Theory of Civic Society

Society in the Horizon of Culture——A Research Based on Ontology,Subjective Experience and Methodology

Sun Benwen and the Chinese Sociology in the First Half of the Twentieth Century

Robert E. Park

The Religious Sociology of Durkheim

A Tentative Thesis on the Prospect of the Sociology of Knowledge

From "historicism" to "Constructivism"