Abstract:With regard to the relation between individuality and sociality, there is a widely shared opinion about Durkheimian sociology,which defines it as holism and social determinism,and thus believes that it denies necessarily the individuality of any member of any society. In this paper,the author tries to prove that the opinion in question is inaccurate. For this purpose,three main arguments of that opinion are examined,which are all related to Durkheim's own writings. 1) Holist sociology denies the individuality ontologically speaking. 2) It finds in objective functions the genuine explanations of social phenomena, and therefore denies that individual elements (for instance intentions) could be decisive for actions. 3) It considers the political project which is based on social contract impossible. These arguments rely on two implicit conceptual premises. 1) If sociality is to be understood in a realistic sense,it must be understood as an organism. 2) Individuality relies either on physical auto-sufficiency or on moral autonomy. Both of the premises restrict the concept of"whole"and"individual". After giving account to the popular opinion,the author is to argue over its inaccuracy by showing how Durkheimian sociology has developed. First, Durkheim has made an important concept out of"institution,"in the specific sense that he defined. It meets the requirement of the holism without falling into the organic approach, and it plays a central role in the Durkheimian sociology in broad sense. Second,Mauss and Dumont have made important sociological categories out of"person"and"individual,"which subsequently prove to be specifically modern institutions. As a result, individuality no more appears to be in conflict with sociality,but turns out to be a specific way through which sociality is realized.

Historicizing the category of “religion” in sociological theories: Max Weber and Emile Durkheim

The Religious Sociology of Durkheim

Rersonified Manifestation of Western Rationalism Crisis——Max Weber's Life and His Ideological and Theoretical System(Ⅰ)

Genesis and structure of the religious field

Power,Authority,and Responsibility——An Analysis of Max Weber's Thoughts on International Relations

Another Critique of Modernity:The Relation Between Individuality and Sociality in Durkheimian Sociology

Social Factors in E. Durkheim's Theory

The Sacred, Profane, Pure, Impure, and Social Energization of Culture

Language and imagined Gesellschaft: Émile Durkheim's civil-linguistic nationalism and the consequences of universal human ideals

The Science of Value:Re-Exploring Max Weber’ s Social Scientific Methodology

Formalism Tradition and Cognitive Dilemmas in Max Weber's Economic Social Idea

The Development of K. Kurauchi's Sociology

Neo-Weberian Approaches to China: Cultural Attitudes and Economic Development

Recovering the primitive in the modern: The cultural turn and the origins of cultural sociology

Is Wilson's religion Durkheim's, or Hobbes's Leviathan?

Incurably Religious? Consensus Gentium and the Cultural Universality of Religion

Max Weber and Patterns of Chinese History

An Initial Study of Weber's Analysis of the Origin of Modern Capitalism Based on Two Sociological Aspects

Selective affinity under the relation chain:reading Max Weber's Protestant Ethics and Spirit of Capitalism

Mechanisms in sociology—a critical intervention

Simmel's Concept of Religion Based on Religiousness