Media Studies, Geographical Imaginations and Relational Space
R. Ek
Abstract:Recently, media and communication theorists have shown an incr eased interestin questions about geography, space and spatiality. As argued by Morley andRobins (1995: 30), new information and communication technologies (repre-senting a second media age, according to Holmes (2005)) has made political,economic, social and cultural processes of deterritorialisation, reterritorialisation,delocalisation and relocalisation possible and of a magnitude that at least seemsto be unsurpassable. These societal changes do not, as some scholars argue(Ohmae 1995, O’Brien 1992), mean the end of geography. On the contrary,even if the distance factor has decreased or evaporated in a multitude of ways,“space and place cannot be annihilated” (ibid.). Still, ‘Geography matters’(Massey et al. 1984), even if the geographical concepts of space, place, scaleand spatiality need to be questioned and in some cases redefined in order towork, ontologically speaking, in analyses of the contemporary societal condi-tion. In this context the linkage between geography and communication iscrucial (Jansson 2005) since the contemporary societal condition is permeated,perhaps even constituted by a media and communication apparatus. Commu-nications’ structuring of space influences how things move through it, thus therecan be no geography without communication (Gould 1991).This linkage is conceptualised by Couldry and McCarthy (2004: 2) as’MediaSpace’, a dialectical term that stresses that media and communication,as discursive practices, produce space at the same time as spatialArrangements have consequences for how media forms are materialised.Therefore, “it is necessary to supplement the grammar of interaction thatunderwrites mainstream media and communication studies with an analysisof the organisational, economic and politically determined production of thematerial infrastructures of space and time” (Barnett 2004: 66). This space-sensitive approach could be conducted through, for instance, closer atten-tion to how television as a media form is contextual in scale and place-spe-cific ways (McCarthy 2001: 10) or how media processes as inherently spatialprocesses change the common understanding of how people interact withmedia and media power (Couldry 2000: 23).
Geography