Abstract:The new economic geography has become a hot topic in academia after Krugman won the Nobel Prize in 2008.In the annual conference of AAG in 2009,a special session was organized to discuss about the influence of the Krugman's noble prize on economic geography.In the discussion,some economic geographers favored Krugman's theory,and some opposed it.In the next year's AAG conference,Krugman was invited to give a speech in front of geographers from all over the world about the new economic geography,which was a very good opportunity for Krugman to response to the critics from geographers.In his speech,Krugman emphasized that the new economic geography was developed at the time when the main stream economics had neglected the spatial dimension of economy for a long time.And his efforts were aimed to bring the geographical dimension into the main stream economics and it seemed that he had succeeded.Krugman acknowledged the shortcomings of the new economic geography theory in his speech.Krugman explained the differences between economics and economic geography in terms of methodology.He also reviewed the core-periphery model of the new economic geography theory and he admitted that it was still a big challenge to take the information spillover effect into account when modeling.In the final parts of his speech,Krugman pointed out that the economic geography phenomenon in the newly industrialized economies,especially China,were more consistent with the prediction of the new economic geography theory.He suggested that the new economic geography theory should be incorporated with the comparative advantage trade theory,in order to explain the present global distribution of economic activities.Krugman's speech was quite helpful to eliminate the misunderstanding of the new economic geography from geographers.The criticisms on the new economic geography from geographer and economists are compared in this article.Geographers have paid more attention to the unrealistic assumptions of the modeling.Despite the weak points of the new economic geography,people are still working on the theory to make it more realistic and powerful,which will have the potentials to provide new perspectives for the economic geography studies.Meanwhile,the richness and complexity of the traditional economic geography studies can shed some light on the modeling of the new economic geography.In terms of policy implications,the new economic geography is criticized for its unrealistic assumptions,while the results of the traditional economic geography studies are usually difficult to be generalized due to the uniqueness of the specific cases.Therefore,people in the study of the new economic geography and traditional economic geography should cooperate in the future.

On geography’s skewed transnationalization, anglophone hegemony, and qualified optimism toward an engaged pluralist future; A reply to Hassink, Gong and Marques

Moving Beyond Anglo-American Economic Geography: the Significance of Non-Anglo-american Model

Critical Geography's nature problem and the Lefebvrian ecological dialectic

Perspectives on Internationalism in Geography

A Perspective on Problems and Prospects for Academic Publishing in Geography

Trade, globalization and uneven development

Troubling economic geography: New directions in the post‐pandemic world

Geography and the new social contract for global change research

What kind of theory for what kind of human geography?

Development of economic geography-A study on the "star" scholars in economic geography

Unresolved issues in regional economic resilience: Conceptual ways forward

An economic geography perspective on city diplomacy

Towards new knowledge complexes for critical geographies of alcohol, drinking, drunkenness

Knowledge circulation in urban geography/urban studies, 1990–2010: Testing the discourse of Anglo-American hegemony through publication and citation patterns

Beyond Green: Human–environment geographies for the ‘new’ century

Whither physical geography Redux: Revisiting the place of physical geography in the United States

Theory, explanation, and economics in financial geographies

Divarication and Opposability between"New Economic Geography"and Economic Geography

The Emergence Of Geographical Economics: At The Contested Boundaries Of Economics, Geography, And Regional Science

Will the real people's geography please stand up? Community, public, and participatory geographies in conversation

The Dialogues Between the New Economic Geography and Economic Geography: Past and the Future