Abstract:Objectives: Medical devices based on X-ray imaging, such as computed tomography, are considered notable sources of artificial radiation. The aim of this study was to compare the computed tomography dose volume index, the dose length product, and the effective dose of the brain non-contrast enhanced examination on two CT scanners to determine the current state in terms of radiation doses, compare doses to the reference values, and possibly optimize the examination. Materials and methods: Data from January 2020 to the second half of 2021 were retrospectively obtained by accessing dose reports from the Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS). Data were collected and analyzed in Microsoft Excel. The effective dose was estimated using the dose-length product parameter and the normalized conversion factor for a given anatomical region. For statistical analysis, a two-sample t-test was used. Results: The first data set consists of 200 patients (100 and 100 for older and newer CT scanners) regardless of the scan technique; the average CTDIvol and DLP for the older CT scanner were 57.61 ± 2.89 mGy and 993.28 ± 146.18 mGy cm, and for the newer CT scanner, 43.66 ± 11.15 mGy and 828.14 ± 130.06 mGy cm. The second data set consists of 100 patients (50 for the older CT scanner and 50 for the newer CT scanner) for a sequential scan; the average CTDIvol and DLP for the older CT scanner were 58.63 ± 3.33 mGy and 949.42 ± 80.87 mGy.cm, and for the newer CT, 57.25 ± 3.4 mGy and 942.13 ± 73.05 mGy cm. The third data set consists of 40 patients (20 and 20 for older and newer CT scanners) for the helical scan - the average CTDIvol and DLP for the older CT scanner were 54.6 ± 0 mGy and 1252.2 ± 52.11 mGy.cm, and for the newer CT, 37.18 ± 2.52 mGy and 859.66 ± 72.04 mGy cm. The difference between the older and newer CT scanners in terms of dose reduction was approximately 30 % in favor of the newer scanner for noncontrast enhanced brain examinations performed using the helical scan technique. Conclusion: A non-contrast enhanced brain examination scanned with newer CT equipment was associated with a lower radiation burden on the patient.

Cone Beam CT vs. Fan Beam CT: A Comparison of Image Quality and Dose Delivered Between Two Differing CT Imaging Modalities

[Comparative Dosimetry of Dental Cone-Beam Computed Tomography and Multi-Slice Computed Tomography for Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology].

What is Cone-Beam CT and How Does it Work?

SU-GG-I-17: Comparison of Different Onboard CT Techniques for Image Guided Radiation Therapy (IGRT)

Dose measurements for dental cone-beam CT: a comparison with MSCT and panoramic imaging

Evaluation of cost-effective ratio (imaging quality vs. radiation dose) of Varian cone beam CT based on figure of merit (FOM)

Quantitative analysis of the image quality in megavoltage cone-beam computed tomography

A comprehensive study on the relationship between image quality and imaging dose in low-dose cone beam CT

Image quality evaluation of a new high-performance ring-gantry cone-beam computed tomography imager

A systematic review comparing the effective radiation dose of musculoskeletal cone beam computed tomography to other diagnostic imaging modalities

Comparison of Radiation Dose and Image Quality Between Split-Filter Twin Beam Dual-Energy Images and Single-Energy Images in Single-Source Contrast-Enhanced Chest Computed Tomography

Comparison among Approximate Cone-Beam Reconstruction Algorithms

TU‐E‐110‐04: Tetrahedron Beam Computed Tomography

Dental cone beam CT: A review

Comparison of doses received from non-contrast enhanced brain CT examinations between two CT scanners

Cone-beam CT with a noncircular (sine-on-sphere) orbit: imaging performance of a clinical system for image-guided interventions

[Evaluation of Cone Beam CT Image Quality and Analysis of Its Long-term Stability on HU Values under Different Conditions].

Evaluation of gantry speed on image quality and imaging dose for 4D cone-beam CT acquisition

SU-FF-I-19: Mega-Voltage Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Image Quality: Effects of Scan Length and Monitor Units Per Projection

A cone-beam optical CT based on a convergent light source - Characterization and optimization

Comparison of propagation-based CT using synchrotron radiation and conventional cone-beam CT for breast imaging