Abstract:Abstract Breast cancer (BC) is the most commonly diagnosed non‐skin cancer in women. To achieve early and accurate diagnosis, three‐dimensional (3D) cone‐beam breast computed tomography (CBBCT) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) modalities are used. Importantly, the comparison of reconstruction accuracy of both CBBCT and DBT has rarely been investigated, thus constituting a research gap. This study systematically investigated the performances of the CBBCT and DBT for different reconstruction algorithms using both BR3D breast phantom and breast images. We acquired clinical breast images and scanned the BR3D phantom for additional breast images. These acquired images were used to simulate projection data using predefined CBBCT and DBT geometries. The simulated projections were reconstructed using five different reconstruction algorithms. To evaluate the reconstruction accuracy, we calculated average image quality assessment (IQA) indices, including peak signal‐to‐noise ratio (PSNR), structural similarity index (SSIM), root mean square error (RMSE), and others, across different algorithms and modalities. The pooled PSNR, SSIM, and RMSE for DBT and CBBCT images are (31.6265 ± 0.8725), (0.9353 ± 0.0077), and (0.0270 ± 0.0025) and (29.7007 ± 0.9249), (0.9136 ± 0.0130), and (0.0342 ± 0.0040), which implies that the overall IQA indices of DBT are superior to CBBCT; therefore, DBT tends to reveal more BC detectability as the diagnosis outcome would largely depend on good quality images. The results show that DBT gives an improved result for all algorithms compared to CBBCT, although further experimental trials may be needed to establish the findings fully. The findings suggest that using DBT may enhance the accuracy of BC diagnosis compared to CBBCT due to its superior image quality in clinical practice, emphasizing the importance of selecting optimal reconstruction algorithms for improved diagnostic outcomes.

Comparison among Approximate Cone-Beam Reconstruction Algorithms

Comparison study on typical reconstruction algorithms for fan-beam geometric SPECT

The Study of Relationship Between Circular Orbit Cone Beam Reconstruction Error and Cone Angle

A New Super-Short-Scan Algorithm for Fan-Beam and Cone-Beam Reconstruction

Recent Progress in Image Reconstruction and Processing of 3D Conebeam CT

Performance Comparison of Three Approximate Algorithms for Helical CT

An Error-Reduction-Based Algorithm For Cone-Beam Computed Tomography

A unified analysis of FBP-based algorithms in helical cone-beam and circular cone- and fan-beam scans.

A fast iteration approach to undersampled cone-beam CT reconstruction.

Partial volume and aliasing artefacts in helical cone-beam CT.

Cone Beam CT vs. Fan Beam CT: A Comparison of Image Quality and Dose Delivered Between Two Differing CT Imaging Modalities

New Developments of Exact Cone-beam CT Reconstruction Algorithms

REVIEW OF RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN CONE-BEAM CT RECONSTRUCTION ALGORITHMS FOR LONG-OBJECT PROBLEM

Comparative analysis of cone‐beam breast computed tomography and digital breast tomosynthesis for breast cancer diagnosis: A comprehensive study on reconstruction algorithms

Review of recent development in FDK reconstruction algorithms for 3D cone beam CT

A BPF-type Reconstruction Algorithm for Cone-beam CT System with a Reduced Size Detector

A Half-Scan Error Reduction Based Algorithm for Cone-Beam Ct

A Fast Automatic Reconstruction Method for Panoramic Images Based on Cone Beam Computed Tomography

Generalized Quasi-Exact Algorithms for Image Reconstruction in Helical Cone-Beam CT

Exact Image Reconstruction in a Helical Cone-Beam Scan with a Variable Pitch

3D reconstruction algorithm for cone-beam differential phase contrast computed tomography