Abstract:IMPORTANCE: Endovascular therapy (ET) is typically not considered for patients with large baseline ischemic cores (irreversibly injured tissue). Computed tomographic perfusion (CTP) imaging may identify a subset of patients with large ischemic cores who remain at risk for significant infarct expansion and thus could still benefit from reperfusion to reduce their degree of disability.OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcomes of patients with large baseline ischemic cores on CTP undergoing ET with the outcomes of matched controls who had medical care alone.DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A matched case-control study of patients with proximal occlusion after stroke (intracranial internal carotid artery and/or middle cerebral artery M1 and/or M2) on computed tomographic angiography and baseline ischemic core greater than 50 mL on CTP at a tertiary care center from May 1, 2011, through October 31, 2015. Patients receiving ET and controls receiving medical treatment alone were matched for age, baseline ischemic core volume on CTP, and glucose levels. Baseline characteristics and outcomes were compared.MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was the shift in the degree of disability among the treatment and control groups as measured by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) (with scores ranging from 0 [fully independent] to 6 [dead]) at 90 days.RESULTS: Fifty-six patients were matched across 2 equally distributed groups (mean [SD] age, 62.25 [13.92] years for cases and 58.32 [14.79] years for controls; male, 13 cases [46%] and 14 controls [50%]). Endovascular therapy was significantly associated with a favorable shift in the overall distribution of 90-day mRS scores (odds ratio, 2.56; 95% CI, 2.50-8.47; P = .04), higher rates of independent outcomes (90-day mRS scores of 0-2, 25% vs 0%; P = .04), and smaller final infarct volumes (mean [SD], 87 [77] vs 242 [120] mL; P < .001). One control (4%) and 2 treatment patients (7%) developed a parenchymal hematoma type 2 (P > .99). The rates of hemicraniectomy (2 [7%] vs 6 [21%]; P = .10) and 90-day mortality (7 [29%] vs 11 [48%]; P = .75) were numerically lower in the intervention arm. Sensitivity analysis for patients with a baseline ischemic core greater than 70 mL (12 pairs) revealed a significant reduction in final infarct volumes (mean [SD], 110 [65] vs 319 [147] mL; P < .001) but only a nonsignificant improvement in the overall distribution of mRS scores favoring the treatment group (P = .18). All 11 patients older than 75 years had poor outcomes (mRS score >3) at 90 days.CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In properly selected patients, ET appears to benefit patients with large core and large mismatch profiles. Future prospective studies are warranted.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is whether endovascular treatment (ET) can improve the functional prognosis in patients with acute ischemic stroke who show a large ischemic core (more than 50 ml) on baseline computed tomography perfusion imaging (CTP). Traditionally, such patients are usually not considered suitable candidates for endovascular treatment due to the presence of a large amount of irreversibly damaged tissue. However, the authors hypothesized that a subset of patients with a large ischemic core but still at high risk of significant infarct expansion could be identified by CTP imaging, and these patients might benefit from reperfusion treatment, thereby reducing the degree of disability. Specifically, the study aimed to compare the differences in clinical outcomes between patients with a large baseline ischemic core who received ET treatment and a matched control group who received only medical treatment. The primary outcome measure was the change in the degree of disability assessed by the modified Rankin scale (mRS) at 90 days, with mRS scores ranging from 0 (completely independent) to 6 (death). In addition, the study also evaluated the rate of functional independence at 90 days (mRS scores of 0 - 2), the final infarct volume, and safety endpoints including parenchymal hemorrhage and 90 - day mortality.

Endovascular Treatment for Patients With Acute Stroke Who Have a Large Ischemic Core and Large Mismatch Imaging Profile

Exploring the Relationship Between Ischemic Core Volume and Clinical Outcomes after Thrombectomy or Thrombolysis

Too Good to Treat? Ischemic Stroke Patients with Small Computed Tomography Perfusion Lesions May Not Benefit from Thrombolysis

Effect of Baseline Infarct Size on Endovascular Thrombectomy with or Without Intravenous Alteplase in Stroke Patients: A Subgroup Analysis of a Randomized Trial (DIRECT-MT).

Endovascular Thrombectomy for Large Ischemic Stroke Across Ischemic Injury and Penumbra Profiles

Patients with Ischemic Core ≥70 Ml Within 6 H of Symptom Onset May Still Benefit from Endovascular Treatment

Endovascular Treatment for Minor Acute Ischemic Strokes with Large Vessel Occlusion

Association of Endovascular Thrombectomy with Functional Outcome in Patients with Acute Stroke with a Large Ischemic Core.

Abstract WMP91: Ischemic Injury Extent on Different Imaging Modalities and Its Association With Endovascular Thrombectomy Outcomes for Large Core Stroke: A SELECT2 Imaging Analysis

Abstract TP181: Endovascular Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke With Large Infarct: A Meta Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Endovascular treatment versus standard medical treatment in patients with established large infarct: a cohort study

Most Endovascular Thrombectomy Patients Have Target Mismatch Despite Absence of Formal CT Perfusion Selection Criteria.

Exploring Ischemic Core Growth Rate and Endovascular Therapy Benefit in Large Core Patients

Endovascular Therapy versus Medical Management for Acute Ischemic Stroke with Large Infarct Core: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Thrombectomy in ischemic stroke patients with large core but minor ischemic changes on non-enhanced computed tomography

CTP-Defined Large Core Is a Better Predictor of Poor Outcome for Endovascular Treatment Than ASPECTS-Defined Large Core

Endovascular Stroke Thrombectomy for Patients With Large Ischemic Core: A Review

Endovascular Stroke Thrombectomy for Patients With Large Ischemic Core

Expanding the Treatable Imaging Profile in Patients With Large Ischemic Stroke: Subanalysis From a Randomized Clinical Trial

Endovascular Thrombectomy Outcomes with and without Intravenous Thrombolysis for Large Ischemic Cores Identified with CT or MRI

Endovascular therapy in patients with a large ischemic volume at presentation: An aggregate patient-level analysis