Luis San Román,Bijoy K Menon,Jordi Blasco,María Hernández-Pérez,Antoni Dávalos,Charles B L M Majoie,Bruce C V Campbell,Francis Guillemin,Hester Lingsma,René Anxionnat,Jonathan Epstein,Jeffrey L Saver,Henk Marquering,John H Wong,Demetrius Lopes,Gernot Reimann,Hubert Desal,Diederik W J Dippel,Shelagh Coutts,Richard du Mesnil de Rochemont,Dileep Yavagal,Jean Christophe Ferre,Yvo B W E M Roos,David S Liebeskind,Robert Lenthall,Carlos Molina,Fahad S Al Ajlan,Vivek Reddy,Dar Dowlatshahi,Nader-Antoine Sourour,Catherine Oppenheim,Alim P Mitha,Stephen M Davis,Christian Weimar,Robert J van Oostenbrugge,Erik Cobo,Timothy J Kleinig,Geoffrey A Donnan,Aad van der Lugt,Andrew M Demchuk,Olvert A Berkhemer,Anna M M Boers,Gary A Ford,Keith W Muir,B Scott Brown,Tudor Jovin,Wim H van Zwam,Peter J Mitchell,Michael D Hill,Phil White,Serge Bracard,Mayank Goyal,HERMES collaborators

Abstract:Background: Evidence regarding whether imaging can be used effectively to select patients for endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is scarce. We aimed to investigate the association between baseline imaging features and safety and efficacy of EVT in acute ischaemic stroke caused by anterior large-vessel occlusion. Methods: In this meta-analysis of individual patient-level data, the HERMES collaboration identified in PubMed seven randomised trials in endovascular stroke that compared EVT with standard medical therapy, published between Jan 1, 2010, and Oct 31, 2017. Only trials that required vessel imaging to identify patients with proximal anterior circulation ischaemic stroke and that used predominantly stent retrievers or second-generation neurothrombectomy devices in the EVT group were included. Risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane handbook methodology. Central investigators, masked to clinical information other than stroke side, categorised baseline imaging features of ischaemic change with the Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) or according to involvement of more than 33% of middle cerebral artery territory, and by thrombus volume, hyperdensity, and collateral status. The primary endpoint was neurological functional disability scored on the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at 90 days after randomisation. Safety outcomes included symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage, parenchymal haematoma type 2 within 5 days of randomisation, and mortality within 90 days. For the primary analysis, we used mixed-methods ordinal logistic regression adjusted for age, sex, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score at admission, intravenous alteplase, and time from onset to randomisation, and we used interaction terms to test whether imaging categorisation at baseline modifies the association between treatment and outcome. This meta-analysis was prospectively designed by the HERMES executive committee but has not been registered. Findings: Among 1764 pooled patients, 871 were allocated to the EVT group and 893 to the control group. Risk of bias was low except in the THRACE study, which used unblinded assessment of outcomes 90 days after randomisation and MRI predominantly as the primary baseline imaging tool. The overall treatment effect favoured EVT (adjusted common odds ratio [cOR] for a shift towards better outcome on the mRS 2·00, 95% CI 1·69-2·38; p<0·0001). EVT achieved better outcomes at 90 days than standard medical therapy alone across a broad range of baseline imaging categories. Mortality at 90 days (14·7% vs 17·3%, p=0·15), symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage (3·8% vs 3·5%, p=0·90), and parenchymal haematoma type 2 (5·6% vs 4·8%, p=0·52) did not differ between the EVT and control groups. No treatment effect modification by baseline imaging features was noted for mortality at 90 days and parenchymal haematoma type 2. Among patients with ASPECTS 0-4, symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage was seen in ten (19%) of 52 patients in the EVT group versus three (5%) of 66 patients in the control group (adjusted cOR 3·94, 95% CI 0·94-16·49; pinteraction=0·025), and among patients with more than 33% involvement of middle cerebral artery territory, symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage was observed in 15 (14%) of 108 patients in the EVT group versus four (4%) of 113 patients in the control group (4·17, 1·30-13·44, pinteraction=0·012). Interpretation: EVT achieves better outcomes at 90 days than standard medical therapy across a broad range of baseline imaging categories, including infarcts affecting more than 33% of middle cerebral artery territory or ASPECTS less than 6, although in these patients the risk of symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage was higher in the EVT group than the control group. This analysis provides preliminary evidence for potential use of EVT in patients with large infarcts at baseline. Funding: Medtronic.

Endovascular therapy in patients with a large ischemic volume at presentation: An aggregate patient-level analysis

Exploring the Relationship Between Ischemic Core Volume and Clinical Outcomes after Thrombectomy or Thrombolysis

Effect of Baseline Infarct Size on Endovascular Thrombectomy with or Without Intravenous Alteplase in Stroke Patients: A Subgroup Analysis of a Randomized Trial (DIRECT-MT).

Endovascular Thrombectomy Outcomes with and without Intravenous Thrombolysis for Large Ischemic Cores Identified with CT or MRI

Endovascular Treatment for Minor Acute Ischemic Strokes with Large Vessel Occlusion

Association of Endovascular Thrombectomy with Functional Outcome in Patients with Acute Stroke with a Large Ischemic Core.

Abstract 1: The Very Core Limit Of Endovascular Therapy For Acute Stroke With A Large Ischemic Region

Baseline clinical and neuroradiological predictors of outcome in patients with large ischemic core undergoing mechanical thrombectomy: a retrospective multicenter study

Endovascular Thrombectomy for Large Ischemic Stroke Across Ischemic Injury and Penumbra Profiles

Trial of Endovascular Thrombectomy for Large Ischemic Strokes

Influence of prior intravenous thrombolysis on outcome after failed mechanical thrombectomy: ETIS registry analysis

Abstract TP192: Combined Intra-Venous and Intra-Arterial Thrombolysis versus Intra-Venous Thrombolysis Alone in Stroke Patients Undergoing Mechanical Thrombectomy for Large Vessel Occlusion: A Propensity-Matched Analysis

Abstract TP149: Pretreatment Parameters Predicting Excellent Recanalization of Large Vessel Occlusion in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke

Trial of Endovascular Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke with Large Infarct

Endovascular Thrombectomy for Acute Stroke with Large Ischemic Core: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

Expanding the Treatable Imaging Profile in Patients With Large Ischemic Stroke: Subanalysis From a Randomized Clinical Trial

Safety and clinical outcomes of endovascular therapy versus medical management in late presentation of large ischemic stroke

Imaging features and safety and efficacy of endovascular stroke treatment: a meta-analysis of individual patient-level data

Predictors of independent outcome of thrombectomy in stroke patients with large baseline infarcts in clinical practice: a multicenter analysis

Endovascular Stroke Thrombectomy for Patients With Large Ischemic Core: A Review

The effect of intravenous thrombolysis in stroke patients with unsuccessful thrombectomy