Association of Endovascular Thrombectomy with Functional Outcome in Patients with Acute Stroke with a Large Ischemic Core.

Carlos Garcia-Esperon,Andrew Bivard,Hannah Johns,Chushuang Chen,Leonid Churilov,Longting Lin,Kenneth Butcher,Timothy J. Kleinig,Philip M. C. Choi,Xin Cheng,Qiang Dong,Richard Aviv,Ferdinand Miteff,Neil J. Spratt,Christopher R. Levi,Mark W. Parsons

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0000000000200908

IF: 9.9

2022-01-01

Neurology

Abstract:Background and Objectives Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is effective for patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke with smaller volumes of CT perfusion (CTP)-defined ischemic core. However, the benefit of EVT is unclear in those with a core volume >70 mL. We aimed to compare outcomes of EVT and non-EVT patients with an ischemic core volume >= 70 mL, hypothesizing that there would be a benefit from EVT for fair outcome (3-month modified Rankin scale [mRS] 0-3) after stroke. Methods A retrospective analysis of patients enrolled into a multicenter (Australia, China, and Canada) registry (2012-2020) who underwent CTP within 24 hours of stroke onset and had a baseline ischemic core volume >= 70 mL was performed. The primary outcome was the estimation of the association of EVT in patients with core volume >= 70 mL and within 70-100 and >= 100 mL subgroups with fair outcome. Results Of the 3,283 patients in the registry, 299 had CTP core volume =70 mL and 269 complete data (135 had core volume between 70 and 100 mL and 134 had core volume =100 mL). EVT was performed in 121 (45%) patients. EVT-treated patients were younger (median 69 vs 75 years; p = 0.011), had lower prestroke mRS, and smaller median core volumes (92 [79-116.5] mL vs 105.5 [85.75-138] mL, p = 0.004). EVT-treated patients had higher odds of achieving fair outcome in adjusted analysis (30% vs 13.9% in the non-EVT group; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.1, 95% CI 1-4.2, p = 0.038). The benefit was seen predominantly in those with 70-100 mL core volume (71/135 [52.6%] EVT-treated), with 54.3% in the EVT-treated vs 21% in the nonEVT group achieving a fair outcome (aOR 2.5, 95% CI 1-6.2, p = 0.005). Of those with a core volume >= 100 mL, 50 of the 134 (37.3%) underwent EVT. Proportions of fair outcome were very low in both groups (8.1% vs 8.7%; p = 0.908). Discussion We found a positive association of EVT with the 3-month outcome after stroke in patients with a baseline CTP ischemic core volume 70-100 mL but not in those with core volume >= 100 mL. Randomized data to confirm these findings are required.