Abstract:In a recent article, Wang {\em et al} (Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2020, {\bf 22}, 10624) introduced a new class of interparticle potential for molecular simulations. The potential is defined by a single range parameter, eliminating the need to decide how to truncate truly long-range interactions like the Lennard-Jones (LJ) potential. The authors explored the phase diagram for a particular value of the range parameter for which their potential is similar in shape to the LJ 12-6 potential. We have reevaluated the solid phase behaviour of this model using both Lattice Switch Monte Carlo and thermodynamic integration. In addition to finding that the boundary between hexagonal close packed (hcp) and face centred cubic (fcc) phases presented by Wang {\em et al} was calculated incorrectly, we show that owing to its finite range, the new potential exhibits several `artifact' reentrant transitions between hcp and fcc phases. The artifact phases, which do not occur in the full (untruncated) LJ system, are also found for typically adopted forms of the truncated and shifted LJ potential. However, whilst in the latter case one can systematically investigate and correct for the effects of the finite range on the calculated phase behaviour (a correction beyond the standard long-range mean field tail correction being required to eliminate the artifact phases), this is not possible for the new potential because the choice of range parameter affects the entire potential shape. Our results highlight that potentials with finite range may fail to represent the crystalline phase behavior of systems with long-range dispersion interactions, even qualitatively.

Correction: The Lennard-Jones potential: when (not) to use it

Sensitivity of solid phase stability to the interparticle potential range: studies of a new Lennard-Jones like model

Correction: A Δ-machine learning approach for force fields, illustrated by a CCSD(T) 4-body correction to the MB-pol water potential

Correction: Two-dimensional Polar Metal of a PbTe Monolayer by Electrostatic Doping.

Correction: Quantifying the ion coordination strength in polymer electrolytes

Correction: High-pressure structural phase transition and metallization in Ga2S3 under non-hydrostatic and hydrostatic conditions up to 36.4 GPa

A Critical Comparison of Neural Network Potentials for Molecular Reaction Dynamics with Exact Permutation Symmetry

Better Band Gaps with Asymptotically Corrected Local Exchange Potentials

Correction: f-Element heavy pnictogen chemistry

Correction: A detailed study of the electronic and optical properties of germanium nanotubes

Correction: Molecular dynamics simulation of the mechanical properties of multilayer graphene oxide nanosheets

100 Years of the Lennard-Jones Potential

Correction: The physics and chemistry of graphene-on-surfaces.

Pressure of Coulomb systems with volume-dependent long-range potentials

Correction: Synthesis of heteroleptic phosphine–copper( i ) complexes: fluorescence sensing and catalytic properties

Erratum:Ab Initiointerionic Potentials for NaCl by Multiple Lattice Inversion [phys. Rev. B66, 064106 (2002)]

Correction to "Proppant Settlement and Long-Term Conductivity Calculation in Complex Fractures"

Correction: Applying quantum mechanics to deconvolute benchtop 1 H NMR reaction data

Correction: Insights into the vibration coupling effects on reorganization energy in π-isoelectronic frameworks

Erratum to: Piezotronic effect on the luminescence of quantum dots for micro/nano-newton force measurement