Emotion in man and animal: an analysis of the intuitive processes of recognition.

D. O. Hebb
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0063033
IF: 8.2473
1946-01-01
Psychological Review
Abstract:After questioning the practice of avoiding anthropomorphic terminology in writing on animal behavior, the author proposes to analyze the way in which human beings recognize chimpanzee emotions, to demonstrate that the recognition of human emotions is on a similar basis, and to show that references to emotion and attitudes, whatever they may seem to imply about conscious entities that may not exist, have value as summary descriptions and predictions of behavior. The discussion is based upon accumulated diary records of chimpanzees, descriptions of individual animals, and records of behavior. It is concluded that "recognition of a full, characteristic expression of emotion is the classification of a deviation of behavior from an habitual base line . . . . The recognition of emotion otherwise is a discrimination of a state of changed responsiveness detected from "associated signs.' . . . " These emotions are inferred special states. There is no fundamental difference in recognition of emotion in man and animals. The "ultimate criteria of the various emotions are found in distinctions of overt behavior." The failure "to obtain a reliable recognition of emotions in the laboratory experiments of the last thirty years was the result of a particular experimental procedure." 21 references.
psychology, multidisciplinary
What problem does this paper attempt to address?