Abstract:W ho says scientists are a dispassionate, sober lot? When they start talking about emotions, the fur and the fervent opinions start to fly. The most bruising clashes have revolved around the relative strengths of biology and culture in producing the rich palette of feelings that color daily life. During much of the first half of the 20th century, the dominant view-prominently espoused by anthropologist Margaret Mead -held that each culture shapes its members' emotional experiences in unique ways. In the past few decades, however, biological and evolutionary forces that transcend any particular culture have received growing attention as orchestrators of a universal set of emotions. One current theory, for example, posits that evolution has endowed the human brain with a set of basic emotions, each of which produces a distinctive facial expression-at least when people aren't trying to hide their feelings. A contrasting view holds that emotions and facial displays are social communication tools, which take shape from cultural forces rather than hard-wired brain networks. Everyone agrees, though, that the terrain of emotional development contains many uncharted areas. For instance, researchers have yet to decipher how children attain a sense of when to be angry, how to express anger, or what to do in situations perceived as scary. Three studies published in the July DEvELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY attempt to untangle a few cross-cultural similarities and differences in emotional development. The first project documents the emotional responses of Canadian and Chinese infants to the expressionless face of a parent or stranger. The second investigation tracks the emotional expressions of infants in the United States, Japan, and China during experimental sessions designed to elicit either frustration or fear. The third report delves into the ways Nepalese children raised in either Hindu or Buddhist ethnic groups respond emotionally to challenging social situations. Explorations such as these move toward the ultimate goal of teasing out universal features of emotion from realms of feeling that are unique to specific belief systems, says psychologist Carolyn Saarni of Sonoma State University in Rohnert Park, Calif. "To study the rich variability of emotional experience in individuals and across societies, we will need to add considerable flexibility to our conceptual categories [for describing emotional development]," Saarni contends.

Basic emotion theory, social constructionism, and the universal ethogram

A Model for Basic Emotions Using Observations of Behavior in Drosophila

Do people essentialize emotions? Individual differences in emotion essentialism and emotional experience.

What is an animal emotion?

Social Functions of Emotions in Life and Imaginative Culture

Emotion Theory and Research: Highlights, Unanswered Questions, and Emerging Issues

Primary Emotional Systems and Personality: An Evolutionary Perspective

Constructive Biology of Emotion Systems: First- and Second-Person Methods for Grounding Adaptation in a Biological and Social World

Emotions in the Perspective of Sociology

Mapping the Passions: Toward a High-Dimensional Taxonomy of Emotional Experience and Expression

Forms and Functions of the Social Emotions

Emotional Expression: Advances in Basic Emotion Theory

Modeling the evolution and development of emotions.

A Theory of Emotion, and its Application to Understanding the Neural Basis of Emotion

II. The Emotions and their Philosophy of Mind

Getting a feel for emotions: Emotional development attracts cross‐cultural explorations

Emotion: the Self-regulatory Sense

What Are Emotional States, and Why Do We Have Them?

Lay perspectives on emotion: past, present, and future research directions

A Theory of Emotion, Its Functions, and Its Adaptive Value