Abstract:W ho says scientists are a dispassionate, sober lot? When they start talking about emotions, the fur and the fervent opinions start to fly. The most bruising clashes have revolved around the relative strengths of biology and culture in producing the rich palette of feelings that color daily life. During much of the first half of the 20th century, the dominant view-prominently espoused by anthropologist Margaret Mead -held that each culture shapes its members' emotional experiences in unique ways. In the past few decades, however, biological and evolutionary forces that transcend any particular culture have received growing attention as orchestrators of a universal set of emotions. One current theory, for example, posits that evolution has endowed the human brain with a set of basic emotions, each of which produces a distinctive facial expression-at least when people aren't trying to hide their feelings. A contrasting view holds that emotions and facial displays are social communication tools, which take shape from cultural forces rather than hard-wired brain networks. Everyone agrees, though, that the terrain of emotional development contains many uncharted areas. For instance, researchers have yet to decipher how children attain a sense of when to be angry, how to express anger, or what to do in situations perceived as scary. Three studies published in the July DEvELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY attempt to untangle a few cross-cultural similarities and differences in emotional development. The first project documents the emotional responses of Canadian and Chinese infants to the expressionless face of a parent or stranger. The second investigation tracks the emotional expressions of infants in the United States, Japan, and China during experimental sessions designed to elicit either frustration or fear. The third report delves into the ways Nepalese children raised in either Hindu or Buddhist ethnic groups respond emotionally to challenging social situations. Explorations such as these move toward the ultimate goal of teasing out universal features of emotion from realms of feeling that are unique to specific belief systems, says psychologist Carolyn Saarni of Sonoma State University in Rohnert Park, Calif. "To study the rich variability of emotional experience in individuals and across societies, we will need to add considerable flexibility to our conceptual categories [for describing emotional development]," Saarni contends.

Social Functions of Emotions in Life and Imaginative Culture

Theories in cognition & emotion – social functions of emotion

Forms and Functions of the Social Emotions

Interaction Ritual Approaches to Emotion and Cognition in Science Learning Experiences

Basic emotion theory, social constructionism, and the universal ethogram

The Social Shaping of Emotion

Emotions at the Service of Cultural Construction

Ancestral Diversity: A Socioecological Account of Emotion Culture

Mapping the Passions: Toward a High-Dimensional Taxonomy of Emotional Experience and Expression

How emotion is experienced and expressed in multiple cultures: a large-scale experiment across North America, Europe, and Japan

Emotions in Ritual Theories

Emphasizing the Social in Social Emotion Regulation: A Call for Integration and Expansion

The Emotions in Cultural-Historical Activity Theory: Personality, Emotion and Motivation in Social Relations and Activity

Emotion Norms Are Unique

Getting a feel for emotions: Emotional development attracts cross‐cultural explorations

Language, Emotions, and Cultures: Emotional Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis

Two Sides of Emotion: Exploring Positivity and Negativity in Six Basic Emotions Across Cultures

Emotional Expression: Advances in Basic Emotion Theory

Emotion: the Self-regulatory Sense

Emotion, Organization, and Society