Feasibility of compressed sensing technique for isotropic dynamic contrast-enhanced liver magnetic resonance imaging

Wei Sun,Wentao Wang,Kai Zhu,Cai-zhong Chen,Xi-Xi Wen,Meng-su Zeng,Sheng-Xiang Rao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.109729
IF: 4.531
2021-06-01
European Journal of Radiology
Abstract:<h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Purpose</h3><p>To investigate whether an isotropic T1-weighted gradient echo (T1-GRE) sequence using a compressed sensing (CS) technique during liver magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can improve the image quality compared to that using a standard parallel imaging (PI) technique in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Methods</h3><p>Forty-nine patients with single pathologically confirmed HCC were included in the prospective study, who underwent a 3.0 T MRI including the two T1-GRE sequences (CS and PI). Qualitative analysis including the relative contrast (RC) of liver-to-lesion, liver-to-portal vein and liver-to-hepatic vein on pre-contrast and postcontrast (delayed phase) images were calculated. Respiratory motion artifact, gastrointestinal motion artifact and overall image quality were scored by using a 4-point scale.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Results</h3><p>RC of liver-to-lesion, liver-to-portal vein and liver-to-hepatic vein measured on both pre-contrast and postcontrast phase images were significantly higher for CS than for PI. The scores of overall image quality was comparable between PI and CS (3.98 ± 0.10<em>vs</em> 3.96 ± 0.13, <em>P</em> = 0.083 for pre-contrast; 3.96 ± 0.16 <em>vs</em> 3.93 ± 0.17, <em>P</em> = 0.132 for postcontrast, respectively). The scores of gastrointestinal motion artifact was significantly higher for PI than for CS (3.92 ± 0.21 <em>vs</em> 3.69 ± 0.33 for pre-contrast; 3.86 ± 0.21 <em>vs</em> 3.59 ± 0.30 for postcontrast, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001 for both). The scores of respiratory motion artifact was significantly higher for PI only in pre-contrast sequence (3.97±0.11 <em>vs</em> 3.89 ± 0.22, <em>P</em> = 0.002 for pre-contrast; 3.95 ± 0.18 <em>vs</em> 3.90 ± 0.22, <em>P</em> = 0.083 for postcontrast, respectively).</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Conclusions</h3><p>Compared to the standard PI sequence, the CS technique can provide greater contrast in displaying HCCs and hepatic vessels in MRI without compromise of overall image quality.</p>
radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging
What problem does this paper attempt to address?