Characterization of focal liver lesions: comparison of MRI and MSCT

Hua WANG,Xiao-ying WANG,Yong HUANG,Bing WU,Xin-min LI,Xue-xiang JIANG
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1003-3289.2008.02.021
2008-01-01
Abstract:Objective: To compare the efficacy of plain and contrast enhancement MRI (1.5T or 3T) and dynamic contrast enhanced MSCT (16- or 64-slice) for characterization of focal liver lesions. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 41 patients who underwent MSCT and MRI within one month period for evaluation of focal liver lesions. Triple-phase or dual-phase dynamic contrast enhancement was performed on a 16- or 64-slice MSCT. MRI sequences included transverse T1-weighted images acquired as fast spoiled gradient (FSPGR) in-phase and out-of-phase dual-echo, transverse T2-weighted images with respiratory triggering acquired as fat-suppressed fast spin echo (FSE) or fast recovery fast spin echo (FRFSE), and breath-hold coronal T2-weighted images acquired as single shot fast spin echo (SSFSE) or fast imaging employing steady-state acquisition (FIESTA). Additional dynamic gadolinium enhancement imaging was performed on 20 patients. A total of 75 lesions (32 malignant and 43 benign) were finally confirmed either by histopathology or combined clinical data, typical imaging features and follow-up for a period of at least one year. Chi-Square tests were used to compare the performances of MSCT and MRI in characterization of lesions, respectively. Results: The sensitivity and specificity in differentiation of benign from malignant lesions on MSCT were 80.77% (21/26), 68.42% (26/38) and on MRI were 93.33% (28/30), 97.56% (40/41), respectively. There was no significant difference in sensitivity between two imaging techniques (P=0.311), but the specificity of MRI was significantly higher than that of MSCT (P<0.001). The diagnostic accuracy of MRI based on lesion types (86.36%, 57/66) was significantly better (P=0.004) than that of MSCT (64.41%, 38/59). Conclusion: MRI was superior to MSCT for characterization of focal liver lesions.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?