Development of Respiratory Infection Prevention and Control Self-Efficacy Scale for Adults
Hana Yoo,Namhee Kim
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/jmdh.s456939
2024-05-01
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
Abstract:Hana Yoo, 1 Namhee Kim 2 1 Department of Nursing, Daejeon University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea; 2 Wonju College of Nursing, Yonsei University, Wonju, Republic of Korea Correspondence: Namhee Kim, Wonju College of Nursing, Yonsei University, 20, Ilsan-ro, Wonju, 26426, Republic of Korea, Tel +82-10-9267-3611, Fax +82-33-741-0378, Email Purpose: This study aimed to develop a scale for respiratory infection prevention and control self-efficacy (R-PACS) to measure self-efficacy in the prevention and control of the spread of respiratory infections among adults and to confirm the applicability of the developed scale by testing its validity and reliability. Methods: This methodological study was conducted in two phases. During the first phase, the R-PACS scale was developed after conducting a thorough literature review, content validity, and a pilot test. In the second phase, its validity and reliability were verified against 210 university students in Korea. The criterion validity of the developed R-PACS scale was tested using the correlation with resilience scale. Item analysis, explanatory factor analysis, and convergent and discriminant validity analyses were conducted in order to verify construct validity. Furthermore, Cronbach's α was used to verify internal consistency reliability. Results: The final version of the R-PACS scale comprises 4 factors and 16 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale. Higher scores are interpreted as higher levels of self-efficacy in the prevention and control of respiratory infection. The R-PACS scale exhibited good content validity, construct validity, criterion validity, and reliability. The correlation coefficient of the four factors was ≥ .4, confirming the validity of item convergence; meanwhile, the Cronbach's α coefficient for the final 16 items of the developed scale was 0.923, verifying reliability. This scale consists of four factors: "environmental management", "contact restrictions", "general infection prevention and control", and "early detection". Conclusion: The applicability of the R-PACS scale exhibited acceptable validity and reliability. This scale can be utilized to assess and evaluate the degree of self-efficacy in the prevention and control of respiratory infections among adults. Data obtained using this scale can be utilized for preparing health behavior change and health promotion programs, and practical policies for preventing respiratory infections. Keywords: health behavior, infection control, instrument development, respiratory tract infections, self efficacy Respiratory infections are caused by various bacteria, viruses, and other pathogenic microorganisms in the upper and lower respiratory tract. 1,2 Respiratory infections comprehensively refer to frequent respiratory infectious diseases such as influenza, and novel respiratory infectious diseases such as severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), Middle East respiratory syndrome, and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). 2,3 Specifically, COVID-19, which is caused by SARS-CoV-2, was declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization (WHO) in March 2020. 4 In addition, the importance of respiratory infection control has been emphasized because there is a possibility of a future occurrence of novel and variant respiratory infectious diseases. 4 Therefore, the prevention and control of the spread of novel respiratory infections is a challenge faced worldwide. Self-efficacy is the most powerful concept for explaining human behavior, and it is described as a major determinant of behavioral change. 5 Perceived self-efficacy can determine whether the behavioral process necessary for coping with an upcoming situation is executed. 5 Additionally, judgments of self-efficacy determine an individual's likelihood of engaging in such behavior, how much effort they put into this behavior, how long they can resist when faced with obstacles or adverse experiences, and whether they maintain the particular behavior on a long-term basis. 5,6 The improvement of self-efficacy is an important concept that directly or indirectly affects health behavior and outcomes for the prevention and control of diseases. 7 Self-efficacy, which explains health behavior, was found to predict adherence to infection prevention behavior significantly. 8 In prior studies, self-efficacy has been associated with taking preventive behaviors during the SARS and influenza A pandemics. This included hand washing, respiratory hygiene, and wearing masks when symptomatic. 9,10 Although numerous tools exist to assess behavioral responses during infectious diseases, there are no validated scales that can validly and reliably ass -Abstract Truncated-
health care sciences & services