Abstract:Although both federal securities law and Delaware corporate law have increasingly relied on independent directors in improving corporate governance, there is a fundamental mismatch between these two regimes. Federal securities law relies on independent directors to monitor the management of the corporation, while Delaware corporate law posits the independent directors as the ultimate decision-makers of the corporation, particularly in transactions in which insiders’ interests or incentives are in question. This mismatch emerged in the 1970s, when proponents of the “monitoring board” successfully campaigned for a board structure consisting of a majority of independent directors, in an attempt to transform corporate boards from ceremonial “advisory boards” to active monitors of management performance. While the SEC followed the monitoring board model, several key decisions of the Delaware courts beginning in the 1980s emphasized the decision-making function of the board, and in particular, the role of independent directors in fundamental transactions. This mismatch became salient after the Enron scandal and the 2008 financial crisis, as the SEC gained the authority to promulgate more stringent rules enhancing the independence of the board under Sarbanes-Oxley and Dodd-Frank. The mismatch may be explained either as a philosophical difference between securities regulators and Delaware judges or as an institutional difference between federal legislative bodies and common law courts. One consequence of the mismatch is that, because of the inherent tension between the monitoring and decision-making functions, independent directors are destined to under-perform both functions. I propose several solutions to reconcile the dueling functions of the board.

Independence of board leadership of acquirers and the success of mergers and acquisitions

How Board Faultlines Affect Board Effectiveness in Monitoring

Managerial performance, boards of directors and takeover bidding

Corporate takeovers, firm performance, and board composition

Executive Board Chairs: Examining the Performance Consequences of a Corporate Governance Hybrid

Unintended Consequences of the Independent Board Requirement on CEO Power

Failure and success in mergers and acquisitions

Directors and officers liability insurance and the wealth effect of M&A announcements

Independent Directors: One Head, Two Hats - A Mismatch between Delaware Corporate Law and Federal Securities Law

Board Independence, Ownership Concentration and Corporate Performance - Chinese Evidence

Shared vision and autonomous motivation vs. financial incentives driving success in corporate acquisitions

Decoupling CEO Wealth and Firm Performance: the Case of Acquiring CEOs

Can strong boards and trading experience help CEOs make better decisions ? Evidence from acquisitions by overconfident CEOs

Takeover Bids and Target Directors' Incentives: Retention, Experience and Settling-Up

Removing Vacant Chairs: Does Independent Directors’ Attendance at Board Meetings Matter?

From Classroom to Boardroom: the Value of Academic Independent Directors in China

Institutional Cross-Ownership and Corporate Strategy: The Case of Mergers and Acquisitions

The Effect of Board Characteristics on Firm Environmental Performance

The Independent Board Requirement and CEO Connectedness

Understanding the Board of Directors after the Financial Crisis: Some Lessons for Europe

Appraisal Risk and Corporate Disclosure During Mergers and Acquisitions