Abstract:Forward amplitude analyses constitute an important approach in the investigation of the energy dependence of the total hadronic cross-section [Formula: see text] and the [Formula: see text] parameter. The standard picture indicates for [Formula: see text] a leading log-squared dependence at the highest c.m. energies, in accordance with the Froissart–Lukaszuk–Martin bound and as predicted by the COMPETE Collaboration in 2002. Beyond this log-squared (L2) leading dependence, other amplitude analyses have considered a log-raised-to-gamma form [Formula: see text], with [Formula: see text] as a real free fit parameter. In this case, analytic connections with [Formula: see text] can be obtained either through dispersion relations (derivative forms), or asymptotic uniqueness (Phragmén–Lindelöff theorems). In this work, we present a detailed discussion on the similarities and mainly the differences between the Derivative Dispersion Relation (DDR) and Asymptotic Uniqueness (AU) approaches and results, with focus on the [Formula: see text] and L2 leading terms. We also develop new Regge–Gribov fits with updated dataset on [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] from [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] scattering, including all available data in the region 5 GeV–8 TeV. The recent tension between the TOTEM and ATLAS results at 7 TeV and mainly at 8 TeV is discussed and considered in the data reductions. Our main conclusions are the following: (1) all fit results present agreement with the experimental data analyzed and the goodness-of-fit is slightly better in case of the DDR approach; (2) by considering only the TOTEM data at the LHC region, the fits with L[Formula: see text] indicate [Formula: see text] (AU approach) and [Formula: see text] (DDR approach); (3) by including the ATLAS data the fits provide [Formula: see text] (AU) and [Formula: see text] (DDR); (4) in the formal and practical contexts, the DDR approach is more adequate for the energy interval investigated than the AU approach. A pedagogical and detailed review on the analytic results for [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] from the Regge–Gribov, DDR and AU approaches is presented. Formal and practical aspects related to forward amplitude analyses are also critically discussed.

New properties of elastic pp and scattering at high energies

New properties of elastic $pp$ and $p\bar{p}$ scattering at high energies

Elastic scattering at $\sqrt{s} = 6$ GeV up to $ \sqrt{s} = 13$ TeV (proton-proton; proton-antiproton; proton-neutron)

Relative contributions of cross-even and cross-odd parts to the spin dependent elastic hadron scattering amplitudes at high energies

Improved Systematic of pp Elastic Scattering Data

Dependence of the Structure of the Elastic Scattering Amplitude on Mandelstam Variables at High Energies

Oscillations in the elastic high energy amplitude

pp elastic scattering at ISR and LHC energies

Observation of Odderon Effects at LHC energies -- A Real Extended Bialas-Bzdak Model Study

Pressure dependence of magnetic and superconducting transitions in sodium cobalt oxides NaxCoO2

Energy dependence of proton-proton elastic scattering at large momentum transfer

Nonperturbative gluon exchange in $pp$ elastic scattering at TeV energies

Theoretical Study of Spin Observables in $pd$ Elastic Scattering at Energies $T_p = 800-1000$ MeV

Model of Elastic High-Energy Scattering

Unitarity effects in elastic scattering at the LHC

Eikonalization and Unitarity Constraints

Possible Existence of Kinks in High-Energy ElasticppScattering Cross Section

Leading components in forward elastic hadron scattering: Derivative dispersion relations and asymptotic uniqueness

Parallel scattering, saturation, and generalized Abramovskii-Gribov-Kancheli (AGK) theorem in the EPOS4 framework, with applications for heavy-ion collisions at of 5.02 TeV and 200 GeV

Unitarity effects in high-energy elastic scattering