Numerical investigation on failure mechanism of tunnel lining with different fault dip angles and Geological Strength Index under geohazard of fault movement and seismic action

Venkataraman Jayakumar,Joseph Antony Visuvasam

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2024.2363425

2024-06-24

Geomatics Natural Hazards and Risk

Abstract:In this article, the failure mechanism of the tunnel under geohazard fault movement and non-uniform seismic load was studied. The study area considered was Atal Tunnel in Himachal Pradesh, India, in the North-West of the Himalayas. A normal fault of 10 m width was considered by varying the fault dip angles of 30°, 45°, 60°, 75°, and 90° along with Geological Strength Index (GSI) values of 20, 40, 60, and 80. The finite element models were analysed under fault movement and 4 ground motions. A fault movement of 0.5 m was applied at the bottom of the fault and hanging wall area. The results showed that fault with 60° dip angle produced more structural forces in tunnel lining under fault movement. The fault with 20 GSI rock mass exhibited higher structural forces in the tunnel lining, irrespective of dip angle. In the case of seismic load, a smaller dip angle generates more structural forces. The tunnel lining in the hanging wall experienced more tensile damage, especially in the direction of seismic wave propagation. The left and right sides of the lining in the footwall area underwent tension, whereas the tunnel crown and bottom experience compression under seismic load.

geosciences, multidisciplinary,meteorology & atmospheric sciences,water resources

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper attempts to address the issue of the failure mechanism of tunnels under fault movement and seismic action. Specifically, the study focuses on the impact of different fault dip angles and Geological Strength Index (GSI) on the structural forces of tunnel linings. The research takes the Atal Tunnel in the northwestern Himalayas of India as an example and analyzes the effects of fault movement and four different seismic motions on the tunnel lining through numerical simulation.

The main research contents include:
1. **Impact of different fault dip angles**: The study examined the impact of 30°, 45°, 60°, 75°, and 90° fault dip angles on the structural forces of the tunnel lining.
2. **Impact of Geological Strength Index (GSI)**: GSI values of 20, 40, 60, and 80 were considered to evaluate the response of the tunnel lining under different rock quality conditions.
3. **Impact of fault movement**: A fault displacement of 0.5 meters was applied, and its impact on the tunnel lining was analyzed.
4. **Impact of seismic motion**: Seismic motion data from four different seismic events (Kobe, Kocaeli, Loma Prieta, and Northridge) were used to study the failure mechanism of the tunnel lining under seismic action.

The research results indicate:
- When the fault dip angle is 60°, the tunnel lining experiences greater structural forces under fault movement.
- For rocks with low GSI values (e.g., 20), the tunnel lining will experience higher structural forces regardless of the fault dip angle.
- Under seismic action, smaller fault dip angles result in greater structural forces.
- The top of the tunnel experiences more tensile failure in the direction of seismic wave propagation, while the bottom of the tunnel experiences compression.

These findings help to better understand the behavior of tunnels under complex geological conditions and provide important references for tunnel design and construction.