Abstract:After many years of research across disciplines, it remains unclear whether people are more motivated to seek appraisals that accurately match self-views (self-verification) or are as favorable as possible (self-enhancement). Within sociology, mixed findings in identity theory have fueled the debate. A problem here is that a commonly employed statistical approach does not take into account the direction of a discrepancy between how we see ourselves and how we think others see us in terms of a given identity, yet doing so is critical for determining which self-motive is at play. We offer a test of three competing models of identity processes, including a new "mixed motivations" model where self-verification and self-enhancement operate simultaneously. We compare the models using the conventional statistical approach versus response surface analysis. The latter method allows us to determine whether identity discrepancies involving over-evaluation are as distressing as those involving under-evaluation. We use nationally representative data and compare results across four different identities and multiple outcomes. The two statistical approaches lead to the same conclusions more often than not and mostly support identity theory and its assumption that people seek self-verification. However, response surface tests reveal patterns that are mistaken as evidence of self-verification by conventional procedures, especially for the spouse identity. We also find that identity discrepancies have different effects on distress and self-conscious emotions (guilt and shame). Our findings have implications not only for research on self and identity across disciplines, but also for many other areas of research that incorporate these concepts and/or use difference scores as explanatory variables.

Identity negotiation in roommate relationships: the self as architect and consequence of social reality

Being known, intimate, and valued: global self-verification and dyadic adjustment in couples and roommates

To thine own self be true? Clarifying the effects of identity discrepancies on psychological distress and emotions

Self-verification processes: How we sustain our self-conceptions

The social grounds of personal self: Interactions that build a sense of 'we' help clarify who 'I' am

Fostering group identification and creativity in diverse groups: the role of individuation and self-verification

The Trouble with Change: Self-Verification and Allegiance to the Self

Identity Shift Effects of Self-Presentation and Confirmatory and Disconfirmatory Feedback on Self-Perceptions of Brand Identification

Partner verification: restoring shattered images of our intimates

Why Do(n’t) Your Partner’s Efforts at Self-Improvement Make You Happy? An Implicit Theories Perspective

The Effects of Self-esteem on the Tendency Towards Self-verification: Evidences from Choosing Interaction Partners

Within-person Covariation of Agentic and Communal Perceptions: Implications for Interpersonal Theory and Assessment

Coenhabiting Interpersonal Inter-Identities in Recurrent Social Interaction

Self-views converge during enjoyable conversations

Attributions and communication in roommate conflicts

Interracial roommate relationships: an experimental field test of the contact hypothesis

The true self in reflections? Visual self‐recognition and the Big Five

Can self-verification strivings fully transcend the self-other barrier? Seeking verification of ingroup identities

Cultural Differences in Self-Verification: the Role of Naïve Dialecticism

Residential mobility, self-concept, and positive affect in social interactions.

Four Types of Change and Self‐Other Agreement on Change in Personality Traits During College Years: A Multi‐Informant Longitudinal Study