Abstract:After many years of research across disciplines, it remains unclear whether people are more motivated to seek appraisals that accurately match self-views (self-verification) or are as favorable as possible (self-enhancement). Within sociology, mixed findings in identity theory have fueled the debate. A problem here is that a commonly employed statistical approach does not take into account the direction of a discrepancy between how we see ourselves and how we think others see us in terms of a given identity, yet doing so is critical for determining which self-motive is at play. We offer a test of three competing models of identity processes, including a new "mixed motivations" model where self-verification and self-enhancement operate simultaneously. We compare the models using the conventional statistical approach versus response surface analysis. The latter method allows us to determine whether identity discrepancies involving over-evaluation are as distressing as those involving under-evaluation. We use nationally representative data and compare results across four different identities and multiple outcomes. The two statistical approaches lead to the same conclusions more often than not and mostly support identity theory and its assumption that people seek self-verification. However, response surface tests reveal patterns that are mistaken as evidence of self-verification by conventional procedures, especially for the spouse identity. We also find that identity discrepancies have different effects on distress and self-conscious emotions (guilt and shame). Our findings have implications not only for research on self and identity across disciplines, but also for many other areas of research that incorporate these concepts and/or use difference scores as explanatory variables.

The Trouble with Change: Self-Verification and Allegiance to the Self

Self-verification 360°: Illuminating the Light and Dark Sides

Is identity per se irrelevant? A contrarian view of self-verification effects

Self-verification processes: How we sustain our self-conceptions

Self-verification in clinical depression: The desire for negative evaluation.

Do People Embrace Praise Even When They Feel Unworthy? A Review of Critical Tests of Self-Enhancement Versus Self-Verification

Depression and the search for negative evaluations: More evidence of the role of self-verification strivings.

Therapist verification of patient self-concepts as a responsive precondition for early alliance development and subsequent introject change

To thine own self be true? Clarifying the effects of identity discrepancies on psychological distress and emotions

Self-Verification and Contextualized Self-Views

Partner verification: restoring shattered images of our intimates

Allure of negative feedback: Self-verification strivings among depressed persons.

Is ‘be Yourself’ Always the Best Advice? the Moderating Effect of Team Ethical Climate and the Mediating Effects of Vigor and Demand–ability Fit

The effects of feedback self-consistency, therapist status, and attitude toward therapy on reaction to personality feedback

Self-Verification Strivings in Children Holding Negative Self-Views: The Mitigating Effects of a Preceding Success Experience

Verification and Commitment in Marital Relationships: An Exploration of Self-Verification Theory in Community College Students

Can self-verification strivings fully transcend the self-other barrier? Seeking verification of ingroup identities

The Effects of Self-esteem on the Tendency Towards Self-verification: Evidences from Choosing Interaction Partners

Being known, intimate, and valued: global self-verification and dyadic adjustment in couples and roommates

Self-Liking, Self-Competence, and the Quest for Self-Verification

Says Who? Credibility Effects in Self-Verification Strivings